A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
These days, more and more contemporary attention has been placed on the opinion that an individual’s value is assessed only based on their social hierarchy and property rather than their dignity. Personally, I believe that moral values should be the key to making judgement about a person.
To commence with, social prestige and material goods do not necessarily show that people are perfect in every aspect. It is because these things are just the outside image that people build up in order to attract the public’s attention and increase their own personal reputation, thus gaining a better and more enjoyable life. Moreover, not everyone who lives in luxury can always behave in the right way. Some influential people may take advantage of their being popular to make profit for themselves over the community’s benefits. For example, when a region’s residents were struggling with flood, people from all parts of the country donated money by banking to some celebrities in the belief that their money could make its value. However, these celebrities did not meet people’s expectations by keeping the money in secret for a long time, which deserved to becriticized when coming to light.
Furthermore, ethical dignity is more important to decide whether to pay respect to a person. It may be due to the fact that morals play a role as a compass in a person’s life which helps people to achieve their goals in the right track without being lost into materialism. As a result, these people can both gain their own success and serve as a good member of the community. In addition, there has been a saying: “a clean fast is better than a dirty breakfast” that means people who do not living in lavishness but still behave properly in the public should be respected by other people.
To conclude, I can say in affirmative that high social status and richness alone cannot tell everything about people and therefore, should never be the prior criterion to judge anyone. Instead, I believe moral values such as honesty and kindness will be treasured and placed as the most important factor in assessing other people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-04 | tsln7607 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-15 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | ThanhNT | 89 | view |
- Some people say that healthcare should not be provided for free regardless of a person s income The health of a person is in their own hands and they should therefore be held accountable for that To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays international tourism is the biggest industry in the world Unfortunately international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph shows the production of main fuels in the UK between 1986 and 2000 11
- In some countries around the world men and women are having babies late in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Financial education should be a madatory component of the school program To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65824745089 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0401478548 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127713126128 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473850992458 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391186228199 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890859853466 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334391242197 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.