Plastic shopping bags are used widely and cause many environmental problems. Some people say they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Due to the detrimental impact of plastic bags on the environment, there is an increasing consensus that authorities should enforce a ban on their usage. I partially agree with this viewpoint for several reasons.
On the one hand, implementing strict policies against plastic bags has the potential to mitigate the existing environmental issues. Recent research has indicated that plastic items are a major contributor to the degradation of ecological systems, with an estimated decomposition time of over 20 years. Consequently, proponents of the plastic bag ban argue that it is the most effective measure to alleviate the damage inflicted upon the environment. From this perspective, plastic materials should be substituted with more environmentally-friendly alternatives, such as paper bags.
However, the immediate implementation of stringent policies against plastic bags is not feasible at present. This is primarily due to the fact that no other material has yet inherited the advantages of plastic. The government cannot simply persuade its citizens to abandon their habit of utilizing plastic bags by publicizing studies on the negative impacts of this practice. It is fair to assert that humans are inherently self-interested and unlikely to adopt a new practice solely for the benefit of the general public. There is little likelihood that they will pay attention to eco-friendly products if they cause any inconvenience. This can be clearly observed in the case of Nestcafe Corporation, which introduced paper bags as a substitute for plastic ones. Although this innovative idea initially attracted a large number of customers, paper bags proved to be fragile and easily worn out. As a result, the enterprise experienced a significant decrease in sales, resulting in the lowest revenue in the past decade.
In conclusion, restrictions on plastic bags undeniably alleviate the severity of the current environmental situation. However, governmental institutions should refrain from implementing a ban until scientists develop a pollution-free material that meets the requirements of shoppers.
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Some companies sponsor sports and sports stars as a way to advertise themselves Some people think it is good while others think there are disadvantages Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- As well as making money businesses also have a responsibility towards society To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many young people regularly change their jobs over the years What are the reasons for this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be challenging to be enjoyable To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... practice solely for the benefit of the general public. There is little likelihood that they w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 816, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...his innovative idea initially attracted a large number of customers, paper bags proved to be frag...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6835443038 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43211922827 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613924050633 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3232959212 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.25 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220991263981 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713583003183 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454344935711 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141742466829 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218507899063 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.