Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high tech media such as software videos or Dvds Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or Dvds. Do you agree or disagree?

In recent times, public libraries resources provoke a field of debate for some individuals. Those people greatly believe that common libraries should scant their resources to books only and not to misspend other expensive hight-tech media represented in software, DVDs, and videos. This essay will discuss why such high-tech media is dramatically vital in the light of the world’s dependency on media and the internet.

There is no doubt that traditional books are a very important source of information, especially for those who do not have any access to other sources of guidance. Moreover, written books, for some people, are way more important than any e-learning source for so many reasons. One of these reasons is how cheap and accessible the books are, for example, you can just borrow a book from a friend or a relative and acquire all the knowledge you need without spending a penny. Furthermore, others believe that books are easier on the eyes and help young people become better readers. They also assume that, through books, you can effortlessly absorb more information. These few instances show why some people advocate using books in libraries as better than high-tech media.

Despite the minor perspective associated with limiting the use of high-tech media in libraries, what makes sense for other people is that we have to keep up with the global dependency on the internet. Those who support using books instead of any type of e-learning are totally wrong; in the view of the fact that, public libraries are the best setting for learning how to use computers, which has become a necessary skill for everyone. Over and above that, dealing with given materials on the computer is way easier than any written materials, for instance, if one watches a video, he\ she can forward or backward any part required and repeat it over and over again, one can also search any statement or piece of information one wants to get more details about in a blink of an eye. Overall, the idea of restricting the use of technology-based materials in libraries could potentially lead to a far worse outcome, resulting in the overall technological deterioration of people.

This essay argued that individuals who are against operating the e- learning and technology in the public libraries instead of utilizing books have a flawed understanding of the overall technological progress happening all over the world. In my opinion, using technology, not just in libraries, but in all life aspects is something that we cannot replace, it is a prime dominant principal we all rely on.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-02 tata 73 view
2023-08-01 tata 67 view
2023-08-01 tata 56 view
2023-08-01 tata 56 view
2023-08-01 tata 67 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... dependency on media and the internet. There is no doubt that traditional books...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raries as better than high-tech media. Despite the minor perspective associated...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...technological deterioration of people. This essay argued that individuals who a...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, no doubt, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2162.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06323185012 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79620193034 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543325526932 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.6665024629 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.133333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4666666667 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221229166464 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770517879764 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701600277915 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145219774254 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107253726422 0.056905535591 188% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.