Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Most of the developed countries provide financial aid to the developing nations. It is often argued that helping through money do not solve the problem of poor countries and there should be other measures taken by wealthy nations in order to help the growing economies. This essay will discuss both the scenarios and suggest what measures are beneficial for such economies.
Rich countries always keep a certain portion of their yearly budget towards helping the nations which are in need. Problem with this kind of help is that the receiving nations usually are not in a position to streamline these funds towards their betterment. It only increases the debt of the government. Furthermore, just providing financial aid would not help these countries and might result detrimental to the financial system of the nation. For example, poor countries from central africa are facing tremendous issues related to the money due to prodigal spending of the funds received from the western countries.
In order to tackle such kind of issues countries with financial stability should not only provide cash but also get the receiving countries necessary resources for utilizing those funds in a prudant way. For example, financial advisors would be of great use under such situations, where countries can better channelize their money. This would help the developing nations to understand what are the priorities that are to be addressed first and pondered upon. Usually developing nations need their people to have jobs and self-sustaining business. So instead of using these funds towards building huge army, they can certainly be used for generation of more occupations and business friendly environment. All this can be done if there are qualified financial advisors available with the government.
After discussing both the view I certainly agree that wealthy nations should not only provide money to the poor countries but also help them utilize the fund in a better way.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28888888889 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67329109166 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6348839958 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.066666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295342955662 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10921670834 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925047790429 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212917917029 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617993754613 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.