Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while other believe that would be a waste of money.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The issue of local dialects which used by a minor percentage of people and whether hey should be protected through governmental fund or not, is turned to matter of debate these days. I personally believe every effort should be done to prevent these small languages from extinction.
Those who are supporters of only one official language argue that funds must be allocated to only main language of a country in order to divert extra money, which might be needed to spend on maintenance of small languages, towards other basic infrastructures including education and sanity. Taking the health system as an example, can be profited the most from the funds which supposed to be invested on small dialect. Furthermore, by using one common language, every misconception derived from diverse idioms that might be implicated by a minority groups could be prevented and this can be lead to more unity across the country.
However, I strictly am in favor of those who are supporters of governmental funding on local dialects because of cultural and national reasons. Local languages are considered as a great part of the culture in every small district whose people are communicating by it. For example, Kurdish dialect in western art of our country is as important as economy for Kurd society. Moreover, the sense of patriotism, which can be emerged through these languages among their speakers should not be overlooked. This kind of sensations, provided that to be conducted in a logical way by authorities, might lead to boost nationalism all over a country.
In conclusion, while investing on only one language has its own benefits, I think funding and maintaining minority languages seems much more reasonable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-14 | hoaithuongnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | Hanabi | 56 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- People who do not use social media networks will always fall behind in career development opportunities To what extent do you feel that this is an accurate and important prediction 78
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions 56
- Many people today are worried about cybercrime such as hacking and identity theft What problems does cybercrime cause and what solutions can you suggest for ordinary people and businesses to take 78
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 7, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...small languages from extinction. Those who are supporters of only one official languag...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...owever, I strictly am in favor of those who are supporters of governmental funding on l...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a logical way" with adverb for "logical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nsations, provided that to be conducted in a logical way by authorities, might lead to boost nat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, look, moreover, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13620071685 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88661116038 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587813620072 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0667753366 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.272727273 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221933222122 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883216056999 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605757263853 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140962553762 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313153947074 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.