Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is obvious that more and more minority languages are disappearing. There are some suggestions that governments should not waste money to protect these languages. However, I argue that they should be preserved and protected.
There are several reasons why saving minority languages could be seen as a waste of money. Firstly, there are only a small number of indigenous who speak these languages so it would be expensive to create educational programs for other people. Instead, governments should spent money for healthcare, infrastructure and other public services,... Secondly, it would be more convenient and more efficient for countries to have just one official language. Make the inhabitants learning this official language will be easier for other people to communicate with them. In addition, educating these minority group will definitely cheaper than teaching a majority of people to learn these sparse languages.
Despite those controversies mentioned above, I still believe that governments should try to preserve languages that are less widely spoken. A language is not just words, it has a lose connection to the cultural identity of its native speakers. If a language extinct, the diversity of cultural identity will be affected and our society will not as interesting as before. By preserving endangered languages, governments can also protect traditions, customs and behaviors that are parts of their inhabitants and the whole country's history.
All things considered, preserving minority languages can be costly but I believe that government should maintain these languages for the long-term effects on our cultural heritage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-14 | hoaithuongnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | Hanabi | 56 | view |
- The Pie chart below shows the average household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...waste of money. Firstly, there are only a small number of indigenous who speak these languages so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...infrastructure and other public services,... Secondly, it would be more convenient...
^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this minority' or 'these minorities'?
Suggestion: this minority; these minorities
...icate with them. In addition, educating these minority group will definitely cheaper than teac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n. A language is not just words, it has a lose connection to the cultural identity of ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'will' requires base form of the verb: 'interest'
Suggestion: interest
...be affected and our society will not as interesting as before. By preserving endangered lan...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59760956175 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97675422186 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585657370518 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6106154271 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.357142857 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383342992918 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130204574244 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719495213533 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224671202656 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660490450963 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.