Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case do you think this is a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones.
Why is this the case? do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Nowadays, there is an ongoing debate about the habit of using smartphones for hours every day among children. From my perspective, I suppose that this issue might have negative consequences. In this essay, I will analyze the reason for this and explain my opinion.
With regard to this habit, there are several fundamental factors leading to it. The chief element can be a lack of parental management. In particular, a large number of parents still let their kids play on smartphones uncontrollably. This deed partly comes from the overindulgence of parents but also from their inadequate knowledge about this issue. Besides, the uncomplicated approachability of online content can also be one of the reasons for this. These days, a lot of online platforms simplify the login process to optimize accessibility for users. This also means that children are able to discover and enroll in these apps, causing addictions subsequently.
In my view, this habit has to be terminated due to its detrimental effects. Firstly, an apparent consequence is its harmfulness to children’s health. Specifically, the screen of smartphones emits a large amount of blue light into our eyes. In the long term, it will lead to visual diseases such as myopia or astigmatism. Secondly, smartphone addiction can keep children from contacting family members. This will cause division in the family as well as poor communication skills among the children.
In conclusion, the habit of overusing smartphones among children comes primarily from poor parental management and uncomplicated platform accessibility. On account of their potential illnesses and the loss of connection with their families, I strongly oppose this habit and am hoping that there will be a solution to this issue.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-25 Elahe13 73 view
2024-01-17 tteruchan65 84 view
2023-11-21 hanifah 73 view
2023-09-04 writingme 78 view
2023-07-31 Ngoc Nam 61 view
Essays by user Ngoc Nam :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... of parental management. In particular, a large number of parents still let their kids play on sm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 500, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ays, a lot of online platforms simplify the login process to optimize accessibility for u...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: AM_I[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am I'?
Suggestion: am I
...ilies, I strongly oppose this habit and am hoping that there will be a solution to...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, as to, i suppose, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in my view, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32616487455 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11494486546 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594982078853 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2406435942 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.5555555556 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2777777778 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272228099185 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835282540848 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540937665531 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181737935135 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462594332435 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... of parental management. In particular, a large number of parents still let their kids play on sm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 500, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ays, a lot of online platforms simplify the login process to optimize accessibility for u...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: AM_I[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am I'?
Suggestion: am I
...ilies, I strongly oppose this habit and am hoping that there will be a solution to...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, as to, i suppose, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in my view, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32616487455 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11494486546 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594982078853 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2406435942 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.5555555556 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2777777778 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272228099185 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835282540848 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540937665531 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181737935135 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462594332435 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.