Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
Running initials trials of several scientific discoveries on animals is one of the hot topics among the scientists and animals' rights organizations. One school of thought regards such trials as cruelty and seeks laws to ban it while others opine that such experiments are necessary before applying scientific discoveries such as drugs on human beings. Though these experimentations often put animals' lives on risk, but I stand with later school of thought because human lives are far more precious than the animals. With advancement of artificial intelligence, there is a much potential of transforming experiments on living to virtual animals, but it'll probably take a bit longer to adopt this idea.
If we go through history of vaccines' discoveries, about all the drugs were tested on animals first. Even in prevailing pandemic of today's era, vaccines for COVID-19 are first tested on animals and then the trials are done on human beings. It is because a drug may have unprecedented side-effect and put a life on high risk. So, scientists prefer risking a mouse or some other animal rather than a man. The basic argument by animals' rights activists is perfectly fine, but outlawing experimentation on animals means performing such trials on humans which is unacceptable.
With advancements in the field of artificial intelligence, studying effects of different chemicals on human body can be studied through simulations with a certain degree of accuracy. Many machine learning models are being used to study structure of COVID-19 virus and effect of different vaccines on it. But all these studies can simulate a human body with limited accuracy and results can't be relied too much to inject vaccine direct to human body. However, such studies show that AI is very promising to get rid of experimentation on animals in future.
To summarize, though testing scientific discoveries on animals put their lives on high risks but outlawing these trials will pay the price of human lives. Attention should be paid to introduce an AI based virtual human body or animals with higher level of certainties to study drugs effects on them.
- Professional athletes in popular sports like football soccer and basketball are overpaid To what extent do you agree or disagree 26
- University students must pay all tuition fees because it benefits mostly them individually rather than the society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 11
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment D 56
- Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed However others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments Can experimentation on animals be justified Are there any alternatives Giv 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 571, Rule ID: A_MUCH_NN1[1]
Message: Maybe you should omit the article "a", leaving only 'much'.
Suggestion: much
...nt of artificial intelligence, there is a much potential of transforming experiments o...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...s because a drug may have unprecedented side-effect and put a life on high risk. So, scient...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... body with limited accuracy and results cant be relied too much to inject vaccine di...
^^^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ody. However, such studies show that AI is very promising to get rid of experimentation on animal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...o get rid of experimentation on animals in future. To summarize, though testing scient...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16426512968 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89845644359 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564841498559 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.179552236 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.466666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268127181264 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943050738334 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492164090423 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167090190067 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157804480694 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.