Some people think that intelligence is innate while others think we can improve our intelligence through learning. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Some people argue that intelligence can be cultivated with a huge effort, others feel the intellectuality may be originated from a new baby. This citation reaches argument both view, which we will elucidate in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, debaters of intellectual skill acquisition state that through painstaking and challenging process might fail individuals, particularly young learners, to improve their cognitive abilities. This is to say, the emotional instability inflicts the downgrade of self-motivated reflecting on how frustrating they struggle for intellectual performance, as Japan has the highest rate of repetitive student suicides due to academic competition. Furthermore, the highly intricate human brain system, with its limited capacity, stands as a compelling reason why certain people encounter compromised endeavour of learning process. Consequently, ones lack their ability to cope with acquiring academic subjects and forming new memories.
On the other hand, proponents of proponents of gifted cognitive ability highlight that in-genuine quality is inherited by one’s mother. According to researchers, women are more likely to transmit intelligence genes to their children because such genes are located on the X Chromosome with two genetic codes. Moreover, a child’s brain development can also be obtained during pregnancy, where mothers are necessarily to receive nutritious dietary intake in the second trimester. For example, shaping fetal neurodevelopment can be achieved based on maternal diet on a variety of nutrient-dense foods including fruits, vegetables, and healthy fats with omega-3 fatty acids.
Overall, it seems to me that the quality of intelligence is most likely influenced by nature because individuals inherit certain aspects of their intellectuality from hereditary bloodlines and early prenatal nutrition intake. This is as long as they keep enhancing their cognitive abilities through diligent effort and lifelong learning.
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 84
- Social media is gradually replacing in person face to face contact with many people worldwide Do the benefits of social media outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 89
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some cultures children are encouraged to compete against each other What are the advantages and disadvantages of this approach 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...unter compromised endeavour of learning process. Consequently, ones lack their ability ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'proponents of'.
Suggestion: proponents of
...ing new memories. On the other hand, proponents of proponents of gifted cognitive ability highlight that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97212543554 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23988980744 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689895470383 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4814030913 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.833333333 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126508874384 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416778179947 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383700840167 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805595157198 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497920741829 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.