Some people think the manufacturers and shopping malls should sell fewer packaged products while others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some individuals believe that factories and commercial centres should sell products with less packaging whereas, others said that humans should purchase minimum packaging products. Buying products with less packaging is the best way to save money in addition to save the planet. This essay will firstly, look at the opinion of less packaging of goods supporters and secondly, look at the justifications of packaging those products.
One of the most concerning issues for some people especially those in need is the price of goods they are going to buy therefore, those people favour to buy their daily needs with a minimum amount of packaging since this could reduce the cost of it and ensure that they buy things that they indeed asked for. Moreover, other people believe that this packaging is harmful for the sake of environment and it contribute in boosting global warming dilemma because, this packaging, which are usually made of plastic will increase the emissions of dioxide carbon while manufacturing it and this is definitely will be terrible for contribute to boost a severe issue such as global warming.
Another point to be considered, some people proclaim that if factories and commercial markets did not packaging the things that they sell well, those things may be damages or broken especially, if those products were made of glasses of plastic which can leads to serious losses for those interests and it may lead to some damage associated with consumers. Furthermore, if those factories or markets sell their edible products with less packaging it may be infected with germs and bacteria and this is may cause a serious diseases for consumers and may affects the reputation of those suppliers.
In conclusion, suppliers should try hard to make sure that they use as less as possible of packaging for their products to assist poor people overcome their financial difficulties in addition to not causing any damage for people consuming their products.
- The pie chart illustrates the cash flow of a charity of children in the United States in 2016
- The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 67
- Take a look at the question and the graph You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 Summarize the info 56
- Fossil fuels are essential for producing electricity powering industry and fueling transportation However one day we will reach a point when all the world s fossil fuels have been depleted How can we conserve these resources What are some alternatives to 56
- It is common practice for some students to take a gap year after graduating high school to work and or travel What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'did' requires base form of the verb: 'package'.
Suggestion: package
...actories and commercial markets did not packaging the things that they sell well, those t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...hard to make sure that they use as less as possible of packaging for their product...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14641744548 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64531660575 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492211838006 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 20.2975951904 197% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.7604728355 49.4020404114 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 206.5 106.682146367 194% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.125 20.7667163134 193% => OK
Discourse Markers: 18.625 7.06120827912 264% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299592847074 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154999204046 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591021099531 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193190423784 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684264502084 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.9 13.0946893788 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.88 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.48 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.1190380762 178% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.