Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Currently, people reckon that the leading method to absorb immediate occasions is newspapers, yet remaining people will disagree with the opinion since they can absorb via different media. Personally, I believe that this development has both pros and cons because of the following reasons.
On the one hand, it is true that with the development of technology and science, people are currently participating in the hugely varied information from different sources, and it is the key to connect people from different destinations to the newest unfamiliar information from worldwide. Firstly, we can easily access the news’ applications from smartphones through one click, and it will not force people to spend their time commuting from newspapers’ shops to their houses on a daily basis. Moreover, due to environmental conservation, the development of using less products from woods or trees is the best way to maintain people's living standard and needs. For example, in lieu of utilizing newspapers to absorb new events, people can switch to the most comfortable and selective devices such as mobile phones.
However, on the other hand, nowadays, people who are from remote areas and old class are sharply high, so newspapers also play an important role in transferring information. In some case, people living in rural areas such as mountainous destination, land’s areas cannot have enough conditions to access to internet because their destinations will be not available for using mobile phones, so newspaper is the only way for them to absorb event, yet it cannot the newest one because of the long and tortuous distance. As we can see, many old people like utilizing traditional ways such as reading a newspaper because old people tend to have weaker and unclear vision than youngsters, so utilizing newspapers is the best method for them.
In conclusion, reading newspapers or suffering newspapers through smartphones will benefit different types of ages and classes, so it depends on types of users.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | ashkan zaheri | 95 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | CDTSON | 67 | view |
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Organized tours to remote areas and communities are increasingly popular It is a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 67
- The spread of multinational companies and the increase of globalization produces positive effects for everyone To what extent to you agree or disagree 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun products is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... conservation, the development of using less products from woods or trees is the bes...
^^^^
Line 5, column 736, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...newspapers is the best method for them. In conclusion, reading newspapers or suf...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31875 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90570559417 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.7799371069 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.2 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198958631375 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786842116129 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0224601263224 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113329014508 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291968696492 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.