Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some university students opine that they want to learn not just their principle sectors, but also other subjects. Others argue that they should only focus on studying for a qualification. I firmly believe that it's more effective to be master at certain fields. In this essay, I'll discuss both sides of view and give my own opinion.
First of all, students benefit a lot from discovering other subjects because they can gain their knowledge about different fields such as psychology, mathematics or space. Furthermore, that can helps them develop their skills and creativity for numbers of issues in life. However, they will probably have to spend their time and pay attention on those subjects and reduce time for priorities.
On the other hand, being eligible and advanced for certain subjects is a better way to value themselves. As we can see in many companies, they require people who are proficient in specific sectors so that those employees can do their best in that position. Moreover, it takes a lot of time and merit to reach the highest level of a subject or skill, therefore, concentrating only in main subjects that are relevant to their careers is absolutely a smarter idea to be successful. For example, a person who is master at psychologist has a rich horizon about psychology, he does experiments and aboard information about that subject, but he may not know much about music or geography. It’s still better than those who knows a little about psychology and a little about geography but do not deeply understand the worlds inside of each.
In conclusion, I do encourage students to determine and devote themselves in the main subjects in order to prepare the best for careers, while attending lots of classes of different subjects doesn’t bring them the best foundation and probably just a waste of time.
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK
- Some people say that money should be the main measure of success and personal status and wealthy people should be in high demand To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some colleges encourage students to create businesses while they are still in school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Cases of bullying in schools are increasing and worsening What do you think are the causes of this How can we tackle this issue 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...aster at certain fields. In this essay, Ill discuss both sides of view and give my ...
^^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Ill) must be used with a third-person verb: 'discusses'.
Suggestion: discusses
...r at certain fields. In this essay, Ill discuss both sides of view and give my own opin...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...who is master at psychologist has a rich horizon about psychology, he does experi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98697068404 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74613505352 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596091205212 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3070437957 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.769230769 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397506769126 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126025453341 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636332014722 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22505465263 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825094234684 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.