Today people are living longer, so they should work longer. Do you agree or disagree?
In this modern world, medicine and technology are increasingly developing to enable people to live longer despite pollution as well as other threats. Many people believe that a person's lifetime should be proportional to their working time, this means that the longer they live, the longer they should work. However, this opinion is against my belief.
Today, although people's health and longevity have improved due to the development of medicine and technology; however, they still should not work longer even if they live longer than before for the two main reasons. First, with the rapid change of society, it is necessary to acquire new knowledge, new thinking and a new approach. However, for long-term employees, most of them believe in their ability to work and feel difficult to accept new perspectives. If their minds are still lucid, but when their eyes are no longer clear, limbs are more or less slow, then getting them to access new science and technology is really worrying, using the computer is a typical example. Science and medicine only help people live longer, not help older people avoid natural ageing. Second, unemployment of young people is alarming. While there are manifold dynamic young people and talented graduates who want to find a job that is suitable for their abilities, but the positions they hope to be offered have already been taken by long-term employees who should resign those positions if their work performance is no longer efficient.
Advocates of this argument that people who live longer should work longer because this will help reduce pension fund imbalance. In fact, the pension fund management mechanism is currently inadequate in revenue and expenditure, so the risk of rupture or imbalance is inevitable. In addition, those who back this issue believe that long-term employees have more experience than the young. Notwithstanding, a person's experience does not show how long they work, but how their work is effective. The experience if not used appropriately will bring the opposite effect.
For the foregoing discussions, it is clear that the opinion about people should work longer if their life is longer may bring disadvantages instead of merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | msolanki | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
- In many countries nowadays, people still live with their parents after marriage. Do you think this trend has more advantages or disadvantages? 73
- Today people are living longer, so they should work longer. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Drug abuse is becoming more and more common in manycountries. What are some of the problems associated withdrug abuse, and what are some of the possible solutions? 56
- The illustration shows a bicycle, which is an environmentally friendly vehicle. Describe this vehicle and its environmentally friendly feature. 56
- Accidents are common on roads. What are the causes of this problem? Can you speculate the effects of this phenomenon? How could the frequency of accidents be reduced? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...her threats. Many people believe that a persons lifetime should be proportional to thei...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, still, then, well, while, in addition, in fact, as well as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2191011236 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68186501329 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533707865169 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2670210917 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390359866259 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131635547263 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132518317641 0.0667982634062 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27151950323 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544444957857 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.