vRich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

vRich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There has been a considerable debate as to how developed countries can play their part in betterment of underdeveloped countries. It is a known fact that countries with a stable economy helps the needy and poor countries to resolve their issues but unfortunately this does not help the poor countries to overcome their poverty concern. Some people believe that developed countries should opt other means to help the needy country to strengthen their economy. I strongly agree with this phenomenon, i shall explain my stance with valid reasoning and examples in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, predominantly, the developed countries are lending their helping hand by financial aiding the poor countries but unfortunately the required aid does not reach the needy and is distributed among the corrupt authorities. This has been a greatest dilemma of poor countries for a long time. Alongside financial aid, the rich countries can provide career opportunities to the youth of poor country which will not only benefit the poor country's economic condition but also participate in the economic stability of the helping country. For instance, Google Company from the US has been investing and creating job opportunities in India that it is equally beneficial for both the countries.
To elucidate my stance further, helping countries can also build some organizations in the needy country that are owned and controlled but the rich countries and are solely responsible for the educational reforms and poverty eradication; thus eliminating the chances of corruption.
To recapitulate the aforementioned, i instate my stance that helping countries needs to come a step further in order to uplift the unprivileged countries other than financial help.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-04 honguyenlily 73 view
2023-11-29 Alexanderpopov 56 view
2023-11-02 tracywu 84 view
2023-10-31 thaokim2003 89 view
2023-10-23 Giang Tran 73 view
Essays by user Amna Zeeshan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 499, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... I strongly agree with this phenomenon, i shall explain my stance with valid reas...
^
Line 2, column 251, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... the corrupt authorities. This has been a greatest dilemma of poor countries for ...
^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
.... To recapitulate the aforementioned, i instate my stance that helping countrie...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus, as to, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39272727273 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06987495371 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534545454545 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.8362952441 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.3 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42846571181 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193528167583 0.084324248473 230% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108505721971 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282784060799 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398855979267 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.