Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples
It goes without saying that people’s attitudes about different concepts are constantly changing. In this vein, one of the most fundamental attitudes is helping others in the shape of charity or else. There are many debates among individuals about whether people more helped strangers in the past decades, or they are more enthusiastic about helping nowadays. From my point of view, people tend to help others nowadays more than anytime. I will clarify my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, because people’s mindsets changed about charity, they are more willing to help. To be more specific, one of the most significant reconstructions that happened among different strata of society was changing the moral values. Indeed, the government spent a great deal of money and time to teach people that charity is a great moral value. In the long run, people’s mindset changed and became inclined to help others because they see it as a social responsibility. My own experience is a compelling example. I can remember that three years ago, the national television started a show about the benefits of helping others. They used a well-known director for that show to attract audience as many as possible. That tv show was quite famous and invented some special rooms in each street where people can leave their stuff that they do not want. Nowadays, the rooms are one of the famous places in the town, and they are full of clothes or other things.
Furthermore, people nowadays are more willing to help people whom they do not know due to the fact that they are more sensitive about others life’s quality. To shed light on it, this world is occupied with a plethora of disasters, as recession and crimes, and people are informed about them because of social media. All that sad news makes them feel deeper sympathy with others and try to dedicate a part of their possessions to people who need it. As a matter of fact, they try to help others with their issues by cloths or foods. However, it was not the same in the past. The social media, such as Facebook, Instagram did not exist, and accessibility of television was limited. So, some gloomy facts like a clear image of poverty cannot touch people readily, and their passion for helping others was shallow simply because they did not have an understanding about people’s challenges.
To sum up, I wholeheartedly believe that people tendency to help their peers increased in the recent years. Not only played governments a critical role to show charity as a precious value of society, but also people got sensitive about needs of others.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support y 80
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own Use specif 90
- Do you agree or disagree young people enjoy life more than older people do 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, such as, as a matter of fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2180.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92099322799 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61788153114 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528216704289 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.146180407 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7826086957 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2608695652 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36272360373 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106673679544 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793043921977 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224139195577 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666897827507 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.