Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on project. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teachers have different ways of assigning coursework. While some prefer to allocate projects which call for cooperation and teamwork among students, others tend to favor students working on their own. I agree with the view that students can learn more effectively and efficiently when they have to cooperate with others. There are two main reasons which I will explore in this essay.
To start with, students can improve their work effectiveness by dividing the project into different parts and each student just has to focus on only one part of it. In this way, each student has more time and energy to finish the job,and she/he can do the job more thoroughly and patiently. Take myself as an example. I remember when I was in university, my teacher assigned us a case study as homework. We were in groups of 4. We finished the job like this: first, we had a group discussion, analyzing the case. Student A was in charge of organizing the discussion so as to keep the ball rolling. Student B was responsible for taking notes and summarizing each student's main points. Students C took responsibility for PPT preparation while I was in charge of presentation. As a result, we each had a priority and we each could concentrate on just one aspect of the project. We ended up getting a high score for that assignment. Had I had to finished it by myself, I would probably have given up and ended up complaining such a tough job that had cost me much time and energy.
Secondly, every student can be promoted to or forced to work effectively. As is known to all, everyone has inertia. If working independently, many students may be sluggish and laid back. This is human nature. However, if working in a team, students who fall behind the schedule may feel embarrassed and be motivated to catch up with others. As in the above-mentioned case, a group member fell sick during the case study, other group members offered to help her voluntarily. She refused, however. She insisted on finished her part so that she could sleep well because she had done her share of work conscientiously. This is a good illustration of the encouraging nature of collective work.
That said, there may exist some kind of students who have the mentality of taking a free ride. Nevertheless, such cases are few and far between. In addition, even though they can succeed in taking a free ride for the first time, they can hardly take another one, because they could be possibly kicked out by other members and it would be hard for them to find partners next time.
To conclude, students can study more effectively in groups than individually because of specific labour division between members and because of the propulsion nature of teamwork.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, others tend to favor students working on their own. I agree with the view that...
^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...s more time and energy to finish the job,and she/he can do the job more thoroughly a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... in charge of organizing the discussion so as to keep the ball rolling. Student B was re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1038, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd ended up complaining such a tough job that had cost me much time and energy. ...
^^
Line 3, column 1044, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed up complaining such a tough job that had cost me much time and energy. Sec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, in addition, kind of, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7898089172 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78223676445 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539278131635 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.420726916 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7931034483 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2413793103 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44827586207 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260909708877 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635516246492 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657971743928 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151458230626 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864064310839 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.