Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Since the dawn of humanity, people need to be knowledgeable in their life for playing their roles better in their families or society. As far as I am concerned, the place which teachers are standing was more higher than past. So I incline to appreciate the idea that teachers were more valuable by government and in whole by society in the past because of some reasons, among which the issue of that being a teacher was more difficult in the past, and there were not any facilities like internet, etc. therefore, a teacher was the most knowledgeable person in a society in the past the past societies.

In the past, people usually tried to obtain a job and make money to supply their initial requirements to live. But, others like to go to school and get information and knowledge and consequently become a teacher. The deficiency of teacher caused big problems for students and their families who have been trying that their children should go to school. For instance, traveling to another place to attend in a class in some terrible ways that any cars could not be used, was such the problems. Such The matters like these made the step of being a teacher high and valuable which the society appreciated that.

The last but not the least is about the extension of the technology. Today's modern world introduces many prepared facilities that each of the families and the students can use them. By using these, the students can bring a very professional teacher to their home without losing energy or money. Using the internet and seeing such the movies about each desirable courses is a good example for support. Thus, these matters are very effective in the teacher's step in society and make them more insulatary. In spite of today's world, we did not have these situations for teachers in the past.

By and large, teachers are the effective persons in our life and the can complete the parents work in teaching how we are able to make a good life.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 Shiimaaa 76 view
2020-01-28 Shiimaaa 76 view
2019-12-31 Abbas.ghaffari 76 view
2019-12-28 adelali 76 view
2019-12-28 mahdi.sdt 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Hossein Esmaeeli :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...e place which teachers are standing was more higher than past. So I incline to appreciate t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 574, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the past'.
Suggestion: the past
...st knowledgeable person in a society in the past the past societies. In the past, people usua...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, by and large, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52071798476 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507288629738 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8732590192 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0625 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171103353633 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057872336388 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628465772405 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963821679616 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725759245973 0.0645574589148 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.