Universities should spend as much money on sports as they do on libraries.
It is debatable whether universities have to spend as much money on sports as on libraries. It is an intriguing question because opinions regarding this issue can be different relying on the individual’s perspectives. In my opinions, however, I support that universities should spend the same money on sports too for the following reasons.
First of all, spending enough money on sports can relieve students’ stress. The world requires more educative and becomes more competitive. So many students could get a lot of stress. People can relieve their stress in universities by playing sports. For instance, according a study done by the New York Times, it revealed that the best way to remove their stress about study, homework and so on is to play sports. It indicated over 50% of the students who are in universities and high schools remove the stress by doing sports. Thus, it is legitimate to say that universities should spend more money on sports for their students by making more sports clubs and expanding sport facilities. Also, colleges should spend a lot of money on sports to encourage students to interact. Sports need cooperation, so students must practice and play them together. It will be a chance to make new friends. For example, when I were a university student, I joined a soccer club. Actually, I weren’t an outgoing person, so it was always difficult for me to make new friends. Anyway, I liked playing soccer, so I decided to enter the soccer club. It was the best choice of my life. I was able to make a lot of new friends naturally. The club made me happy to go to the college. Through this experience, I realized that sports have a positive power. So, I think universities must spend a lot of money on sports as well as an libraries.
To sum up, exercises are good for students to relieve their stress and make new friends. In conclusion, I firmly believe that universities should spend enough money on sports, too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | mera1t | 76 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | mera1t | 76 | view |
| 2023-05-15 | Umme Abiha | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-15 | slliland | 90 | view |
- some people say that the internet provides us with a lot of valuable information, others think that access to so many information creates problem, which view do you agree with. 60
- Choose one.Is it more important to keep old friends than make new friend? 60
- Universities should spend as much money on sports as they do on libraries 50
- Providing students with grades promotes learning 60
- In order to encourage children to study harder, parents should avoid letting them watch television. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1417, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...end a lot of money on sports as well as an libraries. To sum up, exercises are g...
^^
Line 2, column 1417, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an library' or simply 'libraries'?
Suggestion: an library; libraries
...end a lot of money on sports as well as an libraries. To sum up, exercises are good for st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, anyway, first, however, if, regarding, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84523809524 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89289235477 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485119047619 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2839802874 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.7826086957 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6086956522 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47826086957 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349756951057 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109076030065 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144012284755 0.0737576698707 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272873412361 0.150856017488 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905542398734 0.0645574589148 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.