In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
The issue of field of endeavor it is impossible to succeed in a new field without having back experience is a controversial one. On the one hand, there is nothing like impossible humans are being succeeded in any unknown and byzantine field. On the other hand, to become perfect successful human, they always learn from their back experience. However, in the final analysis, I believe that human can do anything which is impossible.
The main reason that humans are evolving themselves over the time, Technologies are changing day to day and making life more lucid and easy to manage. If we think this era in back twenty years then it might be impossible to happen but human always tries a new field, try to discover unknown study, taking a risk in the field of endeavor. Some of them might be failed because of lack of experience but humans never give up they learn from those failed mistakes. for example, In the back 70s, people were using letters to communicate with family or with relatives. It was a long and loath way to transfer a message but by innovating and studying a new way of communication of spectrum people can communicate easily. There were lots of failures before adding something in the field of endeavor.
Another reason for my view is that past achievement is not that necessary in the field of endeavor, People can try and learn new thing without having an experience. To innovate something new somebody has to start from zero and at zero there is no past achievements. for example, Tesla the one who innovated electricity, DC current, wireless transmission of electricity which was far ahead of that era. He started innovating by making mistakes and from those mistakes, he learned and gathered past experience or we can call them as achievements and innovated something which was ahead of that time.
Some might argue, that past achievements are essential to innovate something meticulous innovation. The basis of past knowledge human can make something even better than previous one. This could help to add something new to the field of endeavor but again there should be an inception. Somebody needs to start it from zero and then human evolve it to make the better innovation.
While there are arguments to be made both sides, But it is not important to have past achievements in order to enter into the field of endeavor.Embryonic people always start from zero, learn from mistakes and discover something which is pompous and untangible.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
2024-04-02 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
2023-09-01 | Sovendo Talapatra | 50 | view |
2023-07-18 | Jonginn | 83 | view |
2022-11-04 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- Blood sports have become a hot topic for debate in recent years. As society develops it is increasingly seen as an uncivilized activity and cruel to the helpless animals that are killed. All blood sports should be banned.Discuss the main arguments for thi 73
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 50
- In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town, we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area. The Hillview landfill, which has been undeveloped for decades, is a perfect site for this plant. The 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 462, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... they learn from those failed mistakes. for example, In the back 70s, people were u...
^^^
Line 6, column 112, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...ry in the field of endeavor, People can try and learn new thing without having an exper...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 245, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...to start from zero and at zero there is no past achievements. for example, Tesla t...
^^
Line 6, column 267, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... at zero there is no past achievements. for example, Tesla the one who innovated el...
^^^
Line 6, column 493, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...those mistakes, he learned and gathered past experience or we can call them as achievements and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Embryonic
...der to enter into the field of endeavor.Embryonic people always start from zero, learn fr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, while, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90714285714 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77285493486 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4129711662 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.473684211 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1052631579 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254561250338 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876679010163 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837556379876 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160293236352 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272625171047 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.