Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Science has provided us with lot of solutions to problems ranging from healthcare, energy to communication. If scientific research and development was to be restricted human race would not
have evolved and would have perished to even slight climatic changes and natural disasters. Science provides us with the tools to deal with the adverse conditions that mother nature
confers us with. Science equips us withs the tools to deal with the perfunctory tasks, so that time can be more effectively utilised in solving more comple problems.
One of the most significant development has been seen in the field of biochemistry. There is cure present for almost any kind of disease, due to which life expectancy has proliferated.
For example the drug marijuana which is illegal in a lot of the countries, scientists have researched and found the drug to be having medicinal properties for fatal diseases like cancer.
The dispensation given by the government has led to the development of such a cure, which otherwise would have been unknown.
Another remarkable discovery was made in the field of alternate sources of energy. The world as we know is running out of fossil fuels and the sources of renewable energy are not efficient
enough to fulfil the energy needs of the evergrowing population. The discovery of nuclear power was a great breakthrough in this field providing us both a sustainable and cleaner source of
energy unlike fossil fuels which were harmful to the environment as well due to the excessive emissions.
Although the unrestricted research has given us a lot of benefits and made our life easier, it also has its negative impacts. Development of nuclear science lead to development of weapons
of mass destruction like nuclear bombs, the research of development if restricted by the government would have not caused destruction of Japan during world war II.
Scientific research is very important for evolution of human beings, if science is limited by government laws and restrictions it might lead to possible stagnation of our human race.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | OliverRaab | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 83
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 66
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 66
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's current headquarters. Moreover, Mi 50
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he adverse conditions that mother nature confers us with. Science equips us withs...
^^^
Line 10, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...both a sustainable and cleaner source of energy unlike fossil fuels which were ha...
^^^
Line 13, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r science lead to development of weapons of mass destruction like nuclear bombs, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, as to, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 336.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19642857143 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93792061687 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529761904762 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7655840581 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35714285714 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 4.97078651685 241% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109014319418 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365948577911 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528059441013 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0452976259347 0.150359130593 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589152067109 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.