Do you think that place where the person grew has an influence on his accomplishments?
Numerous factors are regarded affecting on individual achievement. Among of them, the place that a person grows is directly influential and its importance is noticed by many educational researchers. There are many reasons for my viewpoint, but the following ones are most important.
One very strong argument for effect of living place on accomplishments is the quantity and quality of basic educational facilities which is provided by governments. This possibility is not distributed fairly in many countries and its negative consequences are apparent in majority of cases. The validity of this statement has been asserted by the statistics of scientific attainments, inside and outside of developing countries. Moreover, financial involvements could obviously prevent flourishing of talents and it’s the frequently stressed cause of many failures. In addition, there might be some social limitations or discriminations in somewhere that exclude particular groups. Those could be because of their gender, economic conditions or religious considerations. Tough there are exceptions to every rules. The effect of endeavoring and also being lucky should not be ignored.
On the whole, I espouse the importance of the place where successful persons grow, however the impact of working hard and continuously is undeniable. In despite of welfare services and widespread facilities which are provided in developed societies, many geniuses have been still coming from third world countries. To conclude my essay, I would like to quote an old saying “No Pain No Gain”.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-04 | hemsingh81 | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Ammu helen | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Ammu helen | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | manpreet9999 | 80 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? 11
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? 85
- Do you think that place where the person grew has an influence on his accomplishments? 55
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, third, in addition, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69491525424 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21557408414 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669491525424 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5456185112 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902394373012 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0248369529278 0.0925447433944 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438793239286 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0618797691964 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263374280562 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.1260098522 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.