Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Some believe that technology came to help society; on the other hand, other people disagree with this idea. Personally, I believe that technology has helped everyone even the children. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, technological devices have assisted children to develop themselves. Nowadays parents give smartphones and laptops earlier than in the past so kids learn how to use these devices rapidly. In addition, schools are providing tech devices within classroom in order to follow these trends. My own experience is a compelling example of this. My nephew is eight and he has already known how to use smartphone basically. Since he was a baby my sister used to put cartoons on her tablet to be able to do chores quietly. Consequently, my nephew had his first contact with technology at three years old and he had learned how to touch on tablet and open the tools. For all over these years technology is surrounding him and in the school environment it is not different. My nephew and the other children have tablets to teachers illustrate some subjects easily and I am noticing that he is learning rapidly.
Secondly, children have unlimited access to news on real time and other tools, such as maps, books and games. With a smartphone, tablet or laptop, kids can learn everything. However, parents should pay attention to that and filter what their children are watching, reading or listening. Although parents should concern about this situation, I believe that there are more benefits than drawbacks that technology may provide to children. For instance, the son of my neighbor is ten and he got lost when his parents were shopping. As a result, he sent his location to his mother via Whatsapp and therefore, they were able to find their son in a matter of minutes.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that technology help children in many ways and thus, I disagree with the statement. This is because the devices assist children to develop themselves and kids have access to unlimited tools on real time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 90 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | yuktapradeep | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | theprasad | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | weiwei | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 70
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 70
- A teacher's ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 60
- Smartphones should not be given to their children 73
- Travel is important for personal development. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... known how to use smartphone basically. Since he was a baby my sister used to put car...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
... and open the tools. For all over these years technology is surrounding him and in th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92351274788 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67410092399 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560906515581 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8268755369 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.9 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05 5.45110844103 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180235208092 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535447303339 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475964957968 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110078610286 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280980546127 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.