Robots
These days, using robots has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this trend is not without advantages, the downsides will justify these.
On the one hand, robots bring a variety of benefits for both companies and individuals. First, robots allow companies to increase profits. this is might explained by robots are able to do manual jobs faster than people do, making increase of productivity. Second, robots are able to be used to do works that are risky or heavy to people, such as planetary exploration and coal mining with high accuracy. Furthermore, robots could do tedious household chores from vacuuming to cleaning the house. Based on these modern gadgets, housewives will not be able to do housework, making them have more spare time for personal life.
However, more advantages of this trend should be taken into account. The first reason is that the unemployment rate will increase. In fact, robots are used efficiently in many aspects especially in labor-intensive industries, leading to job loss or layoff in the society. This results in pressing issues such as poverty, social evils. Besides, robots are likely to be dangerous for people whenever they are malfunctioning or are designed for warfare.
In conclusion, with all convincing arguments above, benefits of overuse robots will be overshadowed by drawbacks. It seems to me that using robots effectively would grow from time to time and depend on cutting-edge technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-18 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | lalo | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | tteruchan65 | 84 | view |
| 2023-12-06 | TLan168 | 80 | view |
| 2023-11-04 | uyenmia | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ts allow companies to increase profits. this is might explained by robots are able t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have explained' or 'explain'?
Suggestion: have explained; explain
...nies to increase profits. this is might explained by robots are able to do manual jobs fa...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26808510638 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86425655193 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634042553191 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2182591313 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.5333333333 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381614446743 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138996478829 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103067582491 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232322205167 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064500987905 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.