Many newspapers and magazines feature stories about the private lives of famous people. We know what they eat, where they buy their clothes and who they love. We also often see pictures of them in private situations.
Is it appropriate for a magazine or newspaper to give this kind of private information about people?
Magazines and newspapers keep publishing glimpse of the lives of famous personalities, only because, there is a reader base for these kind of publishing. People are curious about, the kind of lifestyle, these famous personalities follow, they want to imbibe it, they want to dress like how the prominent people do, they try to mimic even small things like their haircut, beard style and so on. It is this fire of curiosity that the literature houses keep fuelling by these pictures.
Coming to the point of it being appropriate or not, there is always a fine line, when, a person’s life is being poked and peeked into. Some celebrities bare themselves to the spotlight by giving interviews, appearing in reality show and offer rather a footstep into their lives. Media houses use this to feed the frenzy people, info about their star. On the contrary, there are celebrities, who do shy away, from any kind of interviews, refrain themselves from participating in any kind of reality shows and provide only a keyhole glimpse into their lives. However, the media houses try to pry into their lives and publish really embarrassing thing, and that is when things turn inappropriate.
It is one thing, when a person bares himself and publications take full mileage of it, however, it is rather inappropriate, when it turns into prying into someone’s life, that too, when they think, it is not to be so and that is when real trouble shoots up. Also, all the publishing houses, should take moral responsibility as to what they publish, as the printing media, is still being followed by a majority of the society, across all age groups. Inappropriate pictures of celebrities, pictures of their private situations on grounds of moral responsibility should not be published.
In other words, there is always a fine line between appropriate and inappropriate. The moral responsibility to publish meaningful and appropriate content lies solely on the publishing houses rather than the celebrity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-19 | Sara Batool | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | Sara Batool | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | RAndrewRubesh | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-09 | Av9ash | 78 | view |
| 2018-03-30 | Fainka | 61 | view |
- Social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter are observed to have more negative effects than positive being more useful for the criminals than others.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and incl 89
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes, the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?G 67
- A friend has agreed to look after your house and pet while you are on holiday.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter,a) give contact details for when you are awayb) give instructions about how to care for your petc) describe other household duties 73
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student. However, there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it difficult to work.Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college. In the letter,a) describe the situatio 56
- Many newspapers and magazines feature stories about the private lives of famous people. We know what they eat, where they buy their clothes and who they love. We also often see pictures of them in private situations.Is it appropriate for a magazine or new 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...nly because, there is a reader base for these kind of publishing. People are curious about...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tween appropriate and inappropriate. The moral responsibility to publish meaningf...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, really, so, still, as to, kind of, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09146341463 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9706513566 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539634146341 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8595025369 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.461538462 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166068735543 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552710006432 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457776335368 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931997902751 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534964014378 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.