Should the government provide people with free accommodation?
The issue of accommodation is so acute, nowadays, that a growing number of people are struggling to rent and save money for housing. This leads one to wonder whether governments should supply unites of society with dwelling. This essay agrees with this point of view for the following reasons.
The first reason is that this initiative may trigger an outburst in population growth. It is scientifically proven that the size of population is directly dependent on the availability of housing. Thus, by securing young families with free living spaces, the country may face an uncontrolled increase in the population, which would lead to a shortage of resources and inevitable collapse in the economy. For example, in the former USSR, the government carelessly launched a housing program, namely “Available apartments”, which ultimately created a problem with excessive fertility.
Another reason why governments should not provide people with free places to live in is that people may lose motivation to work. While living in a rented house. many working people attempt to save up for buying a house in the future, but housing supple by the government may gradually exempt them from the need of going to work. This exemption would ultimately create an adverse impact on the economic development, resulting in an economic collapse and people having to go to work again.
However, some sociologists think that securing people with free shelters is necessary. They say that it would help many families, which possess no permanent places of residence, to settle down in one place instead of constantly relocating. Despite this, providing housing is an unreasonable campaign since it would cause an acute shortage of building materials, leading to long-term delays in construction.
In conclusion, the idea of providing people free housing is irrational because it would lead to unbearable growth in population and serious economical downturn. Before buying an apartment, people should work hard and plan their family.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-20 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-20 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | vu_hieu2k5 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-12 | Surbhithegirl | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | roopdeep | 61 | view |
- For some people shopping is not just about buying what is necessary, but a form of entertainment. Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? 73
- More and more people are moving away from an agricultural background to cities in order to look for work.What will be the consequences of this?What solutions can be offered? 89
- Is virtual reality more than just for fun 87
- Increasing numbers of students are choosing to study abroad. To what extent does this trend benefit the students themselves and the countries involved? What are the drawbacks? 84
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times,especially holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hat people may lose motivation to work. While living in a rented house. many working ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...o work. While living in a rented house. many working people attempt to save up for b...
^^^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing is an unreasonable campaign since it would cause an acute shortage of buildin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39622641509 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96941944516 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572327044025 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6303720723 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344177803613 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107367882471 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11787327109 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187346272501 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639016213679 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.