It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
As children are amoral, it is a moral obligation of parents and teachers to guide them in the right direction. Sometimes in order to teach good things to the children, it is imperative some kind of penalisation should be done if they commit any bad deeds. However, in any case, corporal punishment must not be used to discipline minors. This essay largely disagrees with the penalizing of juveniles and will suggest some innovative penal system to teach children good behaviour without caning or beating them.
One of the most significant setbacks of physical punishment is its negative impact on young children’s psyche. This is because whenever a child is physically punished either from parents or teachers, they go through physical as well as physiological which, indeed, alter their personalities. As a consequence, their development might get hampered. For instance, in a survey carried out by New York Times revealed that 64% of adults who are facing issues in their personal and professional lives have been victims of physical punishment in their childhood. Therefore, giving pain to minors is not acceptable at any cost.
However, some meaningful measures can be taken to imbibe good characteristics in juveniles. At schools, pupils should be assigned to perform some community work as a part of their punishment. By opting such strategy, young students would not only learn some great lessons such as team work, cooperation and selflessness by also broaden their horizons by interacting with people from all walks of life. Additionally, parents can do productive counselling of their offspring rather than abusing them. Communication between parents and children can bring out the best for them since communication can ameliorate family bonding, and mothers and fathers can peep into the root cause of their children’s aberration.
To conclude, during childhood parents and mentor should try to carry forward good behavior to young ones using constructive methods discussed above, which will boost their holistic development without changing their personalities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | eslamyousry | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | shihan99 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | kingdangyeu0606 | 22 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Mimibae 985 | 56 | view |
- The TV and the internet provide opportunity to ordinary people to become famous Is this a positive or a negative development 72
- Some people think that radio is the best way to get news while others think that television is better for this purpose.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- It is inevitable that as technology advances, traditional cultures will be lost. It seems that we cannot have these two things together. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to our natural environment. Why is this happening? What is the solution to it? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, kind of, such as, as well as, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46604938272 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05154837628 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6396468491 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.066666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16755931642 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536521726034 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325627717832 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926020158789 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404503127997 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.