Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested
in their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at
least some of their privacy.
I do agree with the author that the professionals who are famous should expect some degree of loss of privacy. Nevertheless, interference in private life could cause a devastating effect on the life of actors, politicians, and athletes.
The people who are telecasted on television come in the public eye. The common people want to know more about the professionals who become popular and people get much attracted to their personal life. People praise the alacrity and alertness of various famous people and intrigued towards their charismatic career. On the one hand, every human wants fame and recognition among people but on the other hand, they risk their privacy.
Moreover, the privacy of famous people is further compromised by the news channels. In order to gain popularity among the masses, the television news channels have to report things which has the capacity to attract people. Most of the channels show the private life of the famous people in order to get high popularity. These professionals are under duress to be morally correct in public places because after all they are imitated by the myriad of people.
Although people are interested in the life of well-known people, the values and mores of the society should encourage the notion that every individual has the right to have privacy, which cannot be taken away by others. There can be devastating effects on the life of the people if every issue of their personal life is being telecasted at T.V. There are examples of many famous people whose lives were devastated by unnecessary probing in their personal life by media.
Finally, I do agree that well- known professionals should expect certain compromise in their privacy, but the people and media should not go before their private life like hunters in order to get something, that could ruin the lives of these professionals.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with CleanAll used far 77
- "Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce theirintake of foods containing fats and cholesterol, and today low-fat products abound in manyfood stores. Since many of the food products currently marketed by Old 66
- Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high-quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of our deluxe alpaca overcoats. Now that we have a new fabric supplier, we should resume production. This coat should 77
- The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records." 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'wants'' or 'want's'?
Suggestion: wants'; want's
...ic career. On the one hand, every human wants fame and recognition among people but o...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he other hand, they risk their privacy. Moreover, the privacy of famous people i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, after all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0487012987 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66343618452 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50974025974 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5565018194 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.615384615 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272110654644 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958007140187 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535370161044 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155914688764 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392607350153 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.