IT IS MORE IMPORTANT TO KEEP YOUR OLD FRIENDS THAN IS TO MAKE NEW FRIENDS
This topic raises the controversial issue whether it is important to keep your old friend than to make a new friend. As per Dr Karvin," one should make good friends."It means that if your old friend is good then keep your old friend whereas if your old friends is not good .i.e. they are bad in a categorial sense then make new good friends. Personally, I disagree with the context. I feel this way for two reasons in the following ways.
To begin with, If your old friends are rascals, then it is better to not to keep friendship with these friends. Let us look at the instance of my personal experience. There are two phases of friendship one is based on childhood and other is based on adults. My cousin brother childhood phase was very good as compare to adult phase. There are two reasons for such differences. The first reason is that during the adult phase, my brother was indulged in criminal activities and reason is his friend's circle. Whereas in child phase he got the distinction every time and the reason is his friends' circle. Now here, my brother keeps old friends but that friends are categorial bad and make new friends but that friends are also categorial bad. Thus, it is important to keep good friends whether good or bad.
In addition, New friends mean new hopes and new hopes means new ideas and this can be possible through new friends. Let us look at the metaphor of Scientist keowl, At the age of 5, he was bullied by his teachers and reason being his the way to do the work and his intelligence towards the work. Nonetheless, at the age of 17, his friend's circle is totally different where his friend's circle includes his teachers also. Now, these teachers help Keowl to how to work on ideas. Thus, this shows that it is important to make and keep those friend from whom you can learn the different arts.
In conclusion, although in some practical scenarios keeping old friends is far better than making new friends and that practical scenarios include trust, faith etc. Nevertheless, some times old friends betray more than a hostile mate.
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- IT IS MORE IMPORTANT TO KEEP YOUR OLD FRIENDS THAN IS TO MAKE NEW FRIENDS 60
- “The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.” 16
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in 85
- LOYALTY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT QUALITY IN CHOOSING A FRIEND 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...n to make a new friend. As per Dr Karvin,' one should make good friends.'It ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... whereas if your old friends is not good .i.e. they are bad in a categorial sense ...
^^
Line 9, column 414, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...is friends circle includes his teachers also. Now, these teachers help Keowl to how ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, then, thus, whereas, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66937669377 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51223751145 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463414634146 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8365641707 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.15 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.45 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.568658796109 0.236089414692 241% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168105989076 0.076458572812 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181681919898 0.0737576698707 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.38614065354 0.150856017488 256% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116935019775 0.0645574589148 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 58.1214874552 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.