A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
The statement is absolutely clear and comprehensive. It mentions the necessity of following the same national curriculum until the students reach the level of a college education. There could be several views on this particular statement but I would strongly agree and would further strengthen the issue.
When students enter into a kindergarten school, everything is new and strange for them. They come across such a situation for the first time in their lives and it is almost daunting for them to wake up every day and go to a place far away from home and spend time with strange people. Eventually, they are accustomed to the routine and study pattern and start developing themselves in every possible way. They are taught is a specific manner and gradually become more equipped at grasping the concepts quickly. Changing the curriculum after, suppose, the 5th grade would force the students to re-align themselves with the new curriculum and start afresh. Though it might be beneficial for some students who could not cope up with the previous curriculum but for most of them, it could prove to be yet another daunting experience. Students who have studied a particular curriculum for half of their school life would experience a sudden downfall when forced to study a different curriculum which requires disparate studying and teaching patterns.
Another important aspect which has to be taken into consideration is that most of the students do not go abroad for higher studies and would eventually continue their careers in the native country itself. Assuming that the curriculum had changed once in their high school and the college curriculum is again based on the national curriculum, which implies that, students would face yet another ordeal adjusting back to the native pattern of studies. This change at a college level would result in a nightmare for several students.
Thus, instead of changing the curriculum in the middle of the high school, the educational board of that country should shift their focus on improving the current curriculum and making it more competent, viable and efficient. Though to a certain degree, exposure to a different curriculum could prove beneficial for students, but this could also be achieved by various other means. Adopting the most beneficial aspects of a different curriculum or coming up with innovative ideas in order to make the current curriculum efficient is a way of providing the students with the necessary exposure.
In a nutshell, Changing the curriculum in the middle of high school could result in more harm than good as the students may get distracted from their studies and start focussing on adapting to the change.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- adhadfhdafhfhfhfdh 16
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated 50
- According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended super screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific super screen movies a 29
- A recent study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found thatemployees with paid sick leave are 28% less likely to be involved in a work-relatedaccident than employees who do not receive payment for sick leave. Researchershypothesize that em 26
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2266.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16173120729 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72337728715 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496583143508 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8103560977 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.294117647 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8235294118 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82352941176 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26139661136 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858535267295 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830568500281 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141394751886 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396107512521 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.