Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion
With the advancement in technology, it is inevitable that ‘We live in a smaller world’. Communication plays a major role in bringing people together. Today, with the development in science, means to socialize has enormously changed among people.
Few people opine that technical revolution has made the society more willing to engage with one another while the other think conversely. In the forthcoming paragraphs both the point of views are illustrated in detail.
It is undeniable that with the boom in the IT industry and access to technology to the common man, virtual engagement has become a way of life, suiting the faster pace of modern life. Social media and many more networking applications play a major role in interacting with people. Keeping in contact with childhood friends or relatives living abroad is easier. Making new friends and meeting group of people with similar ideas is just a click away. Thereby, the way we mingle in general has revolutionized.
On the flip side of this, we should accept that the technology has made individuals extremely self-centric and sometimes ignorant of their own neighborhood. Day-to-day conversations has become very limited among friends and family, most often an early morning forwards has replaced the real world conversation. Family television time has taken over by personal entertainment in their own devices. Overall there is a decline in emotional connect in public. Children and teenagers are the victims as they are born to this age and find it difficult to balance.
Finally, like every coin has two sides, Although, communication has become very simple and reaching out is easier with technology, the real world interaction, the emotional bond between individuals is depleting. I think that, science has brought people together almost, however, distanced the real relationships in life. It is easier to connect with the President of a country however speaking to our grandparents has taken a back-burner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | ahmed ahmed | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | ahmed ahmed | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | feroz121 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | feroz121 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Your local council is considering closing a sport and leisure center that it runs, in order to save money,Write a letter to the local council, in your letter,Give details of how you and your friends or family use the center.Explain the why the center is i 78
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants.Why do you think people waste food? What are the measures to reduce the amount of food they throw away? 78
- People in the current generation are not fit and active, and it will cause health problems in the future. What could be the reasons and suggest solutions for this issue 89
- Your car is hired from a company and while you are driving on holiday, you have a small accident. You will have to write a report to the company to explain it.You need to explain the following:1. When and where you hired it?2. Describe how the accident ha 84
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 40, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
... It is undeniable that with the boom in the IT industry and access to technology to th...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 261, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'forward'?
Suggestion: forward
...and family, most often an early morning forwards has replaced the real world conversatio...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, however, if, so, while, i think, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38853503185 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01390512162 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0693504456 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133090348852 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373237933846 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544292247443 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783824854524 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685780807907 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.