Science is more useful than human judgement in stopping crime. To what extent do you agree?
Using science and up-to-date technology in investigating and reducing rather than human skills and perception is much more worthy. In my view point, we cannot rely on science only due to the certain reasons which will be explained by me in this very essay.
First of all, we all know that science is not capable of finding out the motives or take testimonies. For instance, in order to comprehend the whole conception of the crime, it is more efficient to know the motives for the future investigation. The second reason is that scientific evidence might be inconclusive in some cases. So, let’s consider when it might not be productive, it is when the acts of crime themselves were in the participation of a huge amount of people. In opinion, without human’s participation, it is extremely hard to criminate guilty people and imprison them afterwards.
On the other hand, it is possible to be skeptical about this argument. Despite the fact that science cannot predict the crime, when the clue of crime is given the technology and crime can be tremendously helpful. For example, DNA can be planted at the scene to incriminate someone who is innocent because DNA is 100 percent accurate.
Having looked at the statement from different prospective, I would like to declare my opinion once again. In opinion, the best way to investigate the crime and find everything well, we need to integrate science and human being therefore with technology we can analyze and find the correct answer faster and more accurate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orrect answer faster and more accurate.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, first of all, in my view, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89653971661 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5516056834 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170248766324 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581971027832 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659795693961 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105923593242 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345194079285 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.