People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, building advanced transport system has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "should government improve transport system rather building new road for vehicles?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is not beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the transportation standpoint, government investments are bound up inextricably with public transport, which indicates they lead to both citizenship convenience and less polluted street. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between pedestrian area and sever regulation as well as an exponential increase in road safety. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of big city is correlated positively with not only new street but also road bridge.
Within the realm of environment, without the slightest doubt, advanced transporting attribute to saving time, in that it would come down to road accident, traffic congestion and air pollution. A salient example of such attribution is electronic vehicles, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take clean energy for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint car smocking increasing problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to nature damage, traffic warden, and even restraint driver license. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of new engine cars and high speed train.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the benefits of developed transportation system are outweigh its drawbacks. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | viviana | 72 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | Nasir-RZN | 88 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | zjaved | 88 | view |
- Culture shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the possible options to eradicate this issue? 77
- Is tourism in less developed countries advantageous? Discuss your views and give opinion. 88
- Do you think students who go to university should pay full fee than who do not go to university given that graduates earn higher salaries. Agree or disagree 11
- building more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? agree or disagree? 11
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the transportation standpoint, gove...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y new street but also road bridge. Within the realm of environment, without...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... engine cars and high speed train. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Line 25, column 199, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
... of developed transportation system are outweigh its drawbacks. However, with the benefi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81016949153 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18008020077 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 139.433497537 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701694915254 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2063774933 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.846153846 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232433554585 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623936771958 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978913166863 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137300241792 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104494250696 0.0609392437508 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.