Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are different views about the governmental control on the building design. While some people advocate that those who invest in constructing an architecture should design it freely as they find it suitable, I agree with the opinion that the design of new buildings in urban areas should be under control of the government.
Some may argue that people expending money should be allowed to design new buildings in a way they feel it adequate. This is because it can have a favorable impact on local economy. These days, scenic views in cities are increasingly important in tourism with the popularity of social media, such as Instagram and Tik Tok. Therefore, unique architecture can contribute to attracting many tourists from all over the world, boosting the local economy. If the government imposes the strict restriction on the design of buildings, the city will be less appealing visually, which may lead to a significant loss of profit.
Nevertheless, I believe that the government in big cities should regulate the design of buildings which are newly developed because they have a responsibility to secure the safety of general citizens. Some artistic buildings which are using many decorative glasses or asymmetric shape are often destroyed easily by natural disasters, such as typhoon or earthquake. This endangers residents and visitors in the city, which can be prevented by the adequate instruction by the government. Furthermore, the governmental regulation is necessary to preserve a beautiful scenery that the city originally had. Freely-designed buildings can disrupt such a city view, harming the value of the city. Kyoto has a strict regulation for colors and the height of buildings, which contributes to maintain the traditional Japanese atmosphere in the ancient capital of Japan.
To sum up, although some may maintain that people spending funds should have freedom to design a building from an economic perspective, I believe that the governmental control is necessary from a viewpoint of safety and preservation of city views.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | Nanddy | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | mirsohails | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ndiep | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | jk1692 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Many people believe that individuals are responsible for their own happiness while others think happiness is dependent on other external factors Discuss both views and include your own opinion 77
- Many people believe that individuals are responsible for their own happiness while others think happiness is dependent on other external factors Discuss both views and include your own opinion 64
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurants in a downtown business district 55
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...er control of the government. Some may argue that people expending money should be a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31595092025 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01596770526 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536809815951 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7327924688 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.785714286 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396725610191 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130566893241 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121662250432 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254346458567 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911452558991 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...er control of the government. Some may argue that people expending money should be a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31595092025 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01596770526 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536809815951 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7327924688 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.785714286 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396725610191 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130566893241 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121662250432 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254346458567 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911452558991 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.