Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In recent years, popularity of cinema has undergone massive changes. Revolutionized technology persuaded people to have a twofold idea about place of cinema in society. While some people enjoy watching films at cinema, other believe there is no need for cinema when new devices provide it. Personally, I believe there are some merits on both sides being elaborated followed by my own take.
On the one hand, there are people who prefer to use their personal laptop or smartphone to watch a movie. They believe with todays’ high tech devices we do not need cinema anymore. The most compelling reason for their assertion is that personal device are easy to approach and portable. Consequently, they benefit us with the opportunity to become able to watch films everywhere we wish. Consider, a person can follow their favorite series in train’s cabin while traveling. Another justification for their assertion is time. Our smartphone is always beside us; we just need to decide about watching to do it in a minute while if we choose cinema it is so complicated as we have to buy ticket in advance, go through a long way to get there and wait in a que to just watch a movie. It is not worth from their point of view.
On the other hand, the opposing view emphasis the importance of cinema to spend a much more pleasurable time. To clarify, they advocate that cinema provides people with a unique experience. Watching a movie with number of individuals having same choice is a satisfying experience. Furthermore, it can count as a potentially effective circumstances to boost our social skills. So, the more people share their moments together, the stronger their community will become. In addition, physically cinema is significantly pleasurable to watch a movie as It possess a large screen and potentially proper sound system. These kinds of equipment are outstandingly expensive to buy by most people.
To conclude, although both side of this controversially argument has their rational support, I believe both way of watching has its own distinct place in our life. Personally, I like to follow the recently released movies on large screen of cinema.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-09 | tsabatt | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-08 | ielts_tony | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-01 | hivafara77 | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-30 | matmat74 | 56 | view |
| 2021-01-31 | Junu93 | 67 | view |
- The system used for rubbish garbage collection in your local area is not working properly This is causing problems for you and your neighbours Write a letter to the local council In your letter Describe how the rubbish collection system is not working pro 89
- Some people believe that women should be treated as equal to men when applying for a job with police or military Others think women are lee suitable for this kind of job Discuss both views and give your own opinion 50
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time and have health problems as a result Why do many working people not get enough exercise What can be done about this problem 73
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time amd have health problems as a result Why do many working people not get enough exercise What can be done about this problem 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8663867219 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558333333333 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2188440466 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7142857143 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250065899244 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667103414433 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621314600998 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156783790655 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778825691013 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.