In spite of the advances made in agricultire, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Currently, the number of people who suffering from starvation increases, although the plethora of measures are used. While this problem is caused by several factors, but feasible solutions can be suggested to tackle the issue.
First of all, as the quantity of population is increasing day by day, many countries have a difficulty to provide them with sufficient food. Since their financial condition are not wealthy enough, thus, they fail to sustain their people with food. Secondly, many lands have been turned into large cities by devastating agricultural lands. As a result, farmers cannot grow any plants such as wheat and rice. Furthermore, the lack of water to irrigate lands also causes losing lands. Consequently, many people are hungry at present.
Even though this is quite serious problem, it can be solved through some measures. Primarily, all nations should unify and they have to fight against this problem together. Governments in the world should pay attention to improve the qualty of lands for agriculture instead of increasing cities. Greenhouses should be created in order to plant vegetables as well as fruits in the winter. Besides that countries have to notice to develop their agricultural industry, namely, they should provide their workers with necessary technologies in agriculture. In this case, we can solve the problem pf starvation.
In conclusion, it would be more efficient to think about the core of the issue, because prevention is better than cure
- Line graph 11
- In spite of the advances made in agricultire many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 73
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 73
- British cuisine composition as of entire caloric intake 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30801687764 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75382325567 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.662447257384 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5349344558 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8666666667 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217414857207 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721125243017 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738556646951 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114494424852 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497605365666 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.