Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
“The truth is oblivious in the most cases and ambivalent in nature.” Why?
Because each side of a story has its own version of truth and unless something becomes a scandal real truth is not never revealed. As the prompt says, scandals prove beneficial and captures are attention to the matters which might have left unnoticed otherwise. Hence I align myself more towards believing scandals are beneficial for the society only till they are not completely tarnishing the image of those involved in the situation.
Eventhough ‘a scandal’ is a big term but due to fast tracked social media, they are converted into a movement. People often align them either as right wing or left and so does Media. In the fight to garner more supporters: reformists, new channels, influencers start to dug deep into the matter and juxtapose the many relevant facts. A celebrity divorcing his wife because of an abusive relationship caught various eye-balls because quite unconventionally this time a man was on the victim's side. It propelled the idea and strongly enforced that men who are usually countered as apathetic are also equally emotionally involved and are mentally ruptured by domestic violence. It is not the story of one who is physically strong wins. Hence it subtly floated that feminism is not only about woman but equal treatment of both genders. A scandal hence drew attention to domestic situation of emotionally tortured men and hightlighted if it has happened to a celebrity might be prevailing to common households as well.
Many may counter it by stating often scandals are simple issues blown out of proportion with ulterior motives of different organisations. News channels in order to get high viewership make deliberate attempts to create scandals of often trivial and perfunctionary matters. A simple act of Trump, the president of the US not wearing a mask has become revolution on social media. It caused an outrage when during a pandemic, he was sighted as not wearing mask. His speakers shared he wore the mask but took it out for pictures while others said, ‘he disbelieved in the use of mask’. The veracity of the matter is still unknown, yet he was condemned by people around the world and became a part of mockery. The act also became an agenda for opposition in their elections. Nevertheless, this scandal again helped WHO to bring attention to vitality of a mask and how necessary it was for one’s safety and of others during COVID 19. Eventhough people many people wore masks to show their disinclination and predilection towards opposition, the scandal worked in the favor of mankind.
Scandals often work as an eye-opener for those unrelated to the cause. They work as catastrophe for those who are related to it. Often the households, personal lives and private matters are exposed to an extent where there is no turning back. Hence scandals are unfathomable and outrage is never controlled so what seem beneficial to one might be devasting to the ones involved. Hence, we need to juxtapose both sides of the scandal and understand if it was worth it or not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | userxyz110 | 54 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 71
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 62
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 34
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ch might have left unnoticed otherwise. Hence I align myself more towards believing s...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age of those involved in the situation. Eventhough ‘a scandal’ is a big term but...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 734, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...y of one who is physically strong wins. Hence it subtly floated that feminism is not ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: Much may; A good deal of may
...ailing to common households as well. Many may counter it by stating often scandals ar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 244, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... extent where there is no turning back. Hence scandals are unfathomable and outrage i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, well, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2589.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 519.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98843930636 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80484972151 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 824.4 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5560330879 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5769230769 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9615384615 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73076923077 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103965671259 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0258192277368 0.0831039109588 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249721901254 0.0758088955206 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0545712245818 0.150359130593 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326314943552 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.