Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As there are increasing numbers of traffic accidents, this leads to many debatable arguments related to whether governments should impose policies to set the lowest age allowed to drive higher or not. In my opinion, I advocate the perspective that limits the range of legal driving ages.
Firstly, driving indeed is an action that can affect directly the safety of the society, therefore, it necessitates to have a great responsibility to drive. Therefore, driving demands drivers to be mature enough to handle themselves, unless it would cause more accidents on the roads. Furthermore, drivers must be in ages that can be legally responsible for their actions, so that they would be punished accordingly to the laws. Because of that, they would pay more attention and awareness when taking part in traffic. As a result, road accidents can reduce, which also increases the safety of society. For instance, in several European countries, since the lawmakers compelled drivers to be older than 20 years old to have driving licenses in 2010, the annual reports of car accidents improved significantly.
Secondly, by limiting the legal driving ages, governments can also reduce the number of transportations running inroads. By having fewer vehicles on roads, drivers not only can avoid traffic jams in rush hours but also can avoid car collisions in high roads. Therefore, they will feel safe when driving on the streets. Moreover, because of the decrease in transportations, traffic infrastructures such as roads, bridges could function well. Consequently, it increases the local road safety and reduces the costs of road maintenance. For example, Singapore is the country that spent the least resources on fixing traffic facilities and controlling traffic regardless of the dense population density, due to the rule to limit the ages allowed to drive.
In conclusion, increasing the minimum legal age for driving vehicles is a feasible measure to improve road safety because it helps to reduce cars and having mature drivers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | emzin | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | UYNDNG | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | UYNDNG | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australia town 89
- Some people think it is one of the best ways to solve environmental problems by increasing the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- As a result of tourism and the increasing number of people traveling there is an growing demand for more flights What problem does this have on the environment What measures could be taken to solve the problem 78
- Many famous sports players advertise in a sports product Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Nowadays films are no longer made by big companies only Digital technology enables everybody to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30434782609 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90792701158 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577639751553 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0916836253 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.866666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1333333333 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222990234909 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808559041668 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748204883798 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169760345192 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850783189378 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.