Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In a modern world, developed nations occasionally have financial aid to poor nations. In my opinion, I believe that rich countries should donate to other types of aid besides money.
To begin with, there are many problems that poor countries need to face that can not be solved by money. Let take the Covid-19 pandemic as an example. In developed countries with technological advances, they can research and produce the vaccine for the disease faster than poorer nations. These vaccine production technologies can not be afforded by developing countries. As a result, poor countries may not produce the vaccine. Aid from rich countries at this time is necessary to control the pandemic by distributing the vaccine to poorer countries at reasonable prices. Otherwise, the disease will spread globally.
In addition, rich countries can help poorer countries by passing on knowledge and technology to them. International cooperation and student exchange are increasingly popular. Through these activities, citizens from less developed countries can learn advanced knowledge and technology. After that, they can return to their home countries and apply what they learned to work. This helps poor countries to improve the quality of labor and raise the education level of the people. Let take the WHO organization as an example. This is a cooperative organization of many countries to support mutual development and solve global problems.
To sum up, there are many ways for developed countries to help poor countries. To achieve the greatest common good, rich nations should provide technology, knowledge, and resources to poorer countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- the graph below shows the number o tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te to other types of aid besides money. To begin with, there are many problems t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this vaccine' or 'These vaccines'?
Suggestion: This vaccine; These vaccines
...the disease faster than poorer nations. These vaccine production technologies can not be affo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, may, so, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43137254902 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90610197365 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0814097846 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.9444444444 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1666666667 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414717261051 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131085331974 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971488226188 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264106367676 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443313923549 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.