Some people think that instead of preventing climate changes we need to find a way to live with it.
to what extent do you agree or disagree.
No one can deny the fact that climate variability is common threat to the world. It is said by certain demographics of society that finding a path to live with it is a better option instead of thinking about its prevention. While this assertion have some pros, I completely disagree with this notion.
The preponderant reason is that it is a preposterous to leave this situation for future if this can be tackled today. This is simply because natural calamities like deforestation, air pollution, global warming and melting of glaciers ice etcetera are interlinked. For instance, for curtailing global warming there is need to lessen the use of fossil fuels and government should focus on the use of green energy through wind power, solar energy and so on; consequently, emission of carbon dioxide become halt at some extent and other problems and climate fluctuations will be mitigated. In short, as government can alleviate these climate variations and present, it is wiser to done so.
Additionally,in case if these changes left for future to address, it will arduous task for regime to deal with natural disaster and safety of human beings because these both complications are occur in proportion. To exemplify it, in case of Tsunami it will tough for higher authorities to stop the flow of a water into residential area along with the safety of individual's life. In addition, government should not forget that most of the megacities of world are lying along coastal line. Thus, leaving the solution of these changes into the future is like opening of parador's box.
In conclusion, even though some masses thought that making strategies to live with it is wiser, I would fully opposes this opinion due to its disasterous repercussions like a destruction of a mortal's life and nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Amarul Azmi | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | Nhun Nhun | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | bnhanh02 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-29 | Hangphan02 | 73 | view |
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is positive or negative development 56
- These days more fathers Stays at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work what could be the reason for this do you think this is as positive or negative development 78
- The threat of nuclear Weapons maintain world peace but nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy the benefits of nuclear technology for outweigh the disadvantages to what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many people are afraid to leave their home because of the crime Some believe that more actions should be taken to prevent crime while other feel that little action can be done to stop crime what is your view 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate changes we need to find a way to live with it to what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
... it is wiser to done so. Additionally,in case if these changes left for future t...
^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'occurred'.
Suggestion: occurred
...gs because these both complications are occur in proportion. To exemplify it, in case...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'water'.
Suggestion: water
... higher authorities to stop the flow of a water into residential area along with the sa...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'oppose'
Suggestion: oppose
...to live with it is wiser, I would fully opposes this opinion due to its disasterous rep...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mortals'' or 'mortal's'?
Suggestion: mortals'; mortal's
...s repercussions like a destruction of a mortals life and nature.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03020134228 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85850303355 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604026845638 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8526506389 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.916666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151302319063 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510445454465 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490413253179 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095867154568 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606550154151 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.