Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention in school. What are the reasons? What could be done to solve this problem?
Inattentiveness among students during lesson hours at school seems to be a universal issue. This problem tends to root in 4 main causes and can be ameliorated using several possible solutions.
Discussing the causes responsible for students’ wavering attention, people first highlight the perennial problem of overbearing syllabuses and outdated teaching practices. For instance, in many schools, students are force-fed abstract concepts and instructed to memorize predetermined answers to prepare for tests, which have proved ineffective in sustaining their interest and attention. Learners’ attentional stamina can also be drained from working long hours, which is substantiated by a schedule that resembles a 9-to-5 workday of adults. Lastly, it is important to include unbalanced lifestyles as a contributing factor. These include staying up late and consuming food lacking vitamins that are important to brain health.
Having examined the aforementioned elements, several remedies are needed to elevate students’ focus at school. While reducing school hours may not be a feasible solution everywhere, academic content in classes can be lightened up and delivered in more engaging ways. For instance, teachers can gamify portions of the lesson with the help of Kahoot and quizizz or organize practicums in which students apply knowledge to solve problems in place of coercing pure memorization. Also, parents can help their children to foster healthier habits. For instance, they can restrict the usage of smart devices at night to ensure sleeping hours and prepare more nutritious meals using publicized guidelines from dietitians.
In brief, students’ struggle to focus during classes could be attributed to overbearing content, obsolete delivery methods, long hours and unhealthy routines. As a result, this necessitates redesigning curricula and better lifestyles among students
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | ngo viet | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Nguyen Hai Dang | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | ngango56 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 89 | view |
- Some people think that students in high or secondary school can choose courses freely others think that courses such as mathematics must be compulsory Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- For all children the ability to play a musical instrument is just as important as the ability to read and write What is the importance of learning to play a musical instrument for a child How important is it in comparison to the ability to read and write 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rated using several possible solutions. Discussing the causes responsible for st...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, may, so, while, for instance, in brief, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87364620939 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04184135211 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649819494585 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7605712156 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.214285714 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171945882761 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056454531061 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393042229811 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112880133779 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289001546174 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.