impacts on tourism
It is beyond doubt that the accelerating development of technology and equipment has brought about significant changes in the community, which includes cheaper airlines to enhance the life quality; thus, individuals can travel abroad more easily. From my perspective, this tendency can have both merits and drawbacks on the countries visited.
On the one hand, the increasing number of people visiting tourist sites can derive benefits to the countries. Obviously, it can make the attractions more popular, providing higher income for the locals and those who possess the tourist accommodation and services. Moreover, this trend also fosters the development of the tourism industry and economy in the countries tremendously since people are encouraged more to take advantage of low-price transportation, namely planes which was only afforded by the extravagant. As a consequence of tourism improvement, there will be more job prospects for the locals, especially the rural ones. For instance, in Quang Ninh Province, Viet Nam, dwellers located on the islands rely mostly on visitors to make their livelihood. Thus, it is the tourism industry that gains a lot thanks to the low-cost airline.
On the other hand, the excessive number of tourists coming to certain destinations can exert innumerable devastating impacts on the environment. Evidently, an influx of holiday-makers will increase the usage of transportation, which releases more greenhouse gas emission, leading to the ozone-layer depletion and air pollution. In addition, it is the visitors who do not foster awareness about the environmental protection that can exacerbate the alarming issue by throwing garbage on the tourist attractions, ruining its beauty and attributing to soil degradation. Moreover, the construction of accommodation and services, namely restaurants, has led to deforestation, causing many animals to become homeless. For instance, in Viet Nam, there have been lots of buildings, resorts and food stalls built in the protected forest or pristine beach in order to maximize their profits without any consideration towards the contamination and its detrimental consequences.
In conclusion, even though lower-cost airline has facilitated our lives on individual and societal level, there still have been significant devastating results that the governments should take viable measure to address.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Roy An | view | |
| 2023-07-10 | Tiểu Tiên | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Nguyên-MTTN | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-23 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | nahhan | 56 | view |
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 78
- maps 84
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think this is happening How can this issue be solved 84
- Many students find it difficult to focus or pay attention at school nowadays What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 78
- The diagram shows the procedure for university entry for high school graduates 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, ruining its beauty and attributing to soil degradation. Moreover, the construc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71549295775 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21156904936 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619718309859 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9847344526 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.928571429 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0990186662551 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321735477354 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521895181594 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0381933128303 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462102993965 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.