Claim: An piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
With the rise in technology, we are so interconnected with each other that any news gets spreaded within a split second. We just click on the share button and the news gets shared globally. Not only news but also any piece of information can be shared within a split second. The claim given by the author states that any piece of information referred to as fact shall not be trusted since it may well be proven false in the near future. The reason being, much of the information that people trust and assume to be true turns out to be fallacious. According to me, I believe that I agree with the claim and reason provided by the author by giving three examples.
First, The rise of technology has mounted the spread of any news, fake or true, at such a rate that avoiding the spread of fake news is inevitable. For instance, Social Media is a platform where we can share information in the form of a chat or a post. There are many WhatsApp forwards which are fake yet distributed widely among people. People cannot seem to distinguish between real and fake piece of information which leads to false beliefs. Hence, the reason provided by the author holds some water and the claim is strengthened.
Second, There are various sources to gain information. One of which is the popular media. Some news channels are known to spread fallacious news in order to attract people. People assume it to be true and go with this information as factually correct. This is the reason why people should recheck the information before believing in it. Hence, any information gained by media can be mistrusted since there a high chance of it being proven false in the near future.
Third, The major growth of technology took place after the invention of internet. Internet has become a necessity. It can be accessed for a lot of different things. One of which is accessing information. Anyone has the ability to post information on the internet making it a viable source for fake informations too. Verification of the information becomes a need. People may trust this information to be factual but it may be false. Hence, the reason stated by the author is strengthened.
Some might argue that not all informations provided by such sources are false. This is the reason why people sould re-verify the information that they have gained. People should not completely trust on one source but check on different sources. This will eliminate the possibility of the information to be proven false in the future and the people can assume things to be factual after apt verification.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-12 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Kamnele | 33 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | IshaanN | 50 | view |
- Claim An piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual turns out to be inaccurate Write a response in which you discuss the exte 50
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College a private institution to the college s governing committee Recently there have been discussions about ending Grove College s century old tradition of all fema 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 548, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
... to be true turns out to be fallacious. According to me, I believe that I agree with the claim ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, then, third, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2125.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77528089888 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67815205355 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442696629213 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0728742697 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.275862069 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3448275862 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439959746299 0.243740707755 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115626178963 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129187066717 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261232233408 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082899765419 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.