Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food. Others, however, think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
It is a well acknowledged that "health is wealth". Presently, some proportion of masses assert that introducing laws regarding to nutritious food by regime could be lucrative idea to ameliorate the health of civilians. on the contrary, some folks believe that it is the primary responsibility of individuals to keep their body fit and healthy. Here, I would like to throw light on both the views with my own perspective.
A bunch of points can be mentioned to support the former view. First and formost, higher authorities can improve the public health by introducing certain laws into existence that only those food items should be imported or exported that are enriched in minerals and vitamins. To elucidate, people become the victim of several disorders such as fat, obesity and skin problem on account of easily availability of oily and spicy junk food and there is no restriction on this type of food. Moreover, the government should stimulate the residents to use only biological fertilizer to accelerate the field of crops instead of chemical manure as this reduce the nutritious value of food. Needless to say, introduction such laws into action by regime can contribute more to improve the health of people.
Manifold points can be taken into account to substantiate latter view. Initially, green vegetables and fruits are eaten by people grown in their kitchen garden by using compost made from vegetable waste and animal Dungs. Besides this, civilians maintain proper balanced diet schedule. Adding to it, folks should engage themselves in doing physical exercise, yoga and meditation as these plays are phenominal role to keep people fit as fiddle.
To recapitulate, it is well said that "two heads are better than one". According to my point of view, both regime and people are ought to take joint responsibility to improve the standard of health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-02 | Chinkiarora | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-02 | Đoàn Thanh Ngân | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-02 | ghazaleh Basiri | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | jasu | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-31 | dattu.vp79@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- Some companies are closing their offices one day per week to save energy gas electricity What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 74
- Some people believe that students should pay their University fees themselves as they benefit from having University studies and not the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Childcare training courses should be mandatory for all parents Do you agree or disagree with this statement given your opinion 93
- Some people say that working couple must equally shared household responsibilities in all cultures across the world However others disagree with this statement To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Demand for gas and oil is increasing and so finding new resources in a remote and untouched area is necessity Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... to ameliorate the health of civilians. on the contrary, some folks believe that i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86363741457 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609836065574 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1393973955 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273455214712 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081225112837 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634469973992 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152090127347 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060560281286 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.