Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is important for the employees to involve themselves for different types of works, instead of investing themselves on same type of activities throughout the time in a particular day. I strongly accede with the particular statement: it would certainly be an exciting process in the stressful times. I will substantiate my position mentioning several reasons in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, allocating different work types makes an individual accustomed to dissimilar environment which certainly will entice them participate in the particular work with great enthusiasm. Having a different work environment makes one feel responsible in his/her work, therefore they will invest their maximum effort in it. For supporting example, no one need a look further than my own work experience. After the completion of my internship, in a steel fabrication company in Nepal (which specifically deals with construction and design of structures using structural steel), I was assigned the job of design engineer. There, I was assigned to work in the design of the structure during the first half, and in the other half, I have to visit the construction site to inspect the construction as per the design. Obviously, both of them had different environments. In addition, I have a responsibility to ensure the proper construction adhering to design. These facets of the work greatly motivated me to ensure adequate design and inspection. Therefore, it is apparent that different environment will surely help us in the work process.
Secondly, while involving yourself in same type of activity will surely make you monotonous resulting in disaffection towards the work. The evident example can be seen in the life my colleague in above mentioned company. My fellow employee, in particular work, was only advised to work on surveying works throughout the day and week. Although he was not hesitated to such works for few months, but after sometimes he evinced dissatisfaction towards his monotonous duty. Moreover, he also wanted to experience design aspects of the engineering works rather than field work (survey) only. Consequently, he resigned within a few time getting over of his duty. Admittedly, doing same kinds of work all day along makes an individual monotonous.
Finally, individual can collaborate with different hierarchical members aiding them in learning various traits for their professional development. There are various characteristics having paramount importance in the individual's personal growth that can be earned from working in diverse work. For instance, my friend worked as an administrative assistant in human resource management company. She , thereby, learned about the management skills dealing with managers, leadership traits with discussion with boss, speaking skills during assisting the clients, and writing skills while preparing reports. It greatly helped her during personal development and confidence. Had she never got chance to work with diverse hierarchy, she would never have experienced such growth.
Taking account of all the above-mentioned considerations, it can be inferred that office individuals can experience diverse environment in one place, avoid monotonous feeling, and interact with different hierarchical individuals making a great memory. Thus, it is imperative to posses dissimilar tasks to the workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Communal Online and Traditional Printed Encyclopedia 80
- Cure of Malaria 80
- Problems in Protecting Wild Tauna 52
- Endothermic Dinosaurs 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me type of activity will surely make you monotonous resulting in disaffection tow...
^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on towards the work. The evident example can be seen in the life my colleague in ...
^^
Line 7, column 397, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n human resource management company. She , thereby, learned about the management s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2858.0 1977.66487455 145% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61493123772 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17058035334 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542239685658 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 886.5 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4769515726 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.851851852 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8518518519 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103361735276 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306358614053 0.076458572812 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256229409893 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0578756147953 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157508473086 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 86.8835125448 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me type of activity will surely make you monotonous resulting in disaffection tow...
^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on towards the work. The evident example can be seen in the life my colleague in ...
^^
Line 7, column 397, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n human resource management company. She , thereby, learned about the management s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2858.0 1977.66487455 145% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61493123772 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17058035334 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542239685658 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 886.5 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4769515726 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.851851852 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8518518519 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103361735276 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306358614053 0.076458572812 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256229409893 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0578756147953 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157508473086 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 86.8835125448 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.