The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore

Essay topics:

The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.

The pie chart illustrates the percentages of qualification in both years 2000 and 2010, while the bar chart indicates the numbers of year that people used to spend from 2000 to 2010.

Overall, it is evident the number of adult females stand still over the years however, it is obvious that university education is the most prevalent degree.

Looking at the pie chart, the master’s degree had boomed through the years with (30.31%). The university qualification had accounted just over the third (32.93). Secondary school qualification percentage had varied to fifth of the percentage (15.2%). Primary school looks to be the less concerned one because it had changed from the quarter of the percentage (25.77%) to less than twentieth of the percentage (2.1%). High school qualification had fluctuated to settle down at just above the fifth (19.55).

With regard to the table, it looks like the average number of years spent at school numbered about 9 million in the early 2000s, and it stated to raise, stabilizing in 2010. Adult women had outnumbered about 8 million, and it started to up and down from 2000 to 2010 finishing at approximately 8.8million.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-06 tata 73 view
2024-06-06 tata 78 view
2024-06-06 tata 67 view
2023-08-08 tata 78 view
2023-08-05 tata 78 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, still, third, while, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05235602094 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76280098251 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549738219895 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2484193487 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148617630088 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593435131514 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631000668759 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106849247426 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582564288388 0.0819641961636 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.