Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of Sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.
Do you agree or disagree ?
In the contemporary society, an increasing number of food items contain sugar in high amounts which may lead to several health issues such as obesity, diabetes, heart disease etc., in the future. Although people suggest that escalating the prices of these products will motivate the consumers to take on diets with low sugar, I disagree with the notion and the following essay will put forth my viewpoint.
To begin with, there are several factors contributing to the addiction of sugary products. Their delectable taste and flavor causes customers to become addicted to these items. Moreover, the competition between companies to attract customers by advertising these items have a profound impact on society. As a consequence of consuming these products loaded with sugar, consumers not only become obesity but also face difficulties in focusing due to the sugar rush in the blood.
In fact, simply raising the prices will have no impact on those attracted toward sugary items. As people work and earn, they will be able to afford these items irrespective of the cost of the item. For instance, a pack of string sweets which contains a handful of chewy strings cost equals to a 10kg pack of rice and people still purchase them. Furthermore, companies will refrain from raising the costs beyond a certain range and risk losing valuable customers. In addition, pushing people to suddenly quit these items may cause a withdrawal reaction and end up working the other way round.
To sum up, although there are multiple side effects of consuming food and drinks with high sugar contents, raising their prices may not be a plausible solution and may result in a reverse reaction and the companies might not be in support of the notion due to risks of losing customers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-05 | MEBC Class | view | |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time, and have health problems as a result.Why do many working people not get enough exercise?What can be done about this problem? 73
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with.What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys? 56
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these vi 61
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives.Which viewpoint do you agree with?Give reasons for your answer and include any re 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h my viewpoint. To begin with, there are several factors contributing to the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04081632653 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57538478372 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574829931973 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4433900075 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200074227624 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652062845718 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055283778367 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125832798081 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437078844035 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.