Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels ofsugar,
which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more
expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.
Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, people suffer certain health issues, which partly because of the consuming of goods that has lot of sugar from many companies such as Pepsi and Coca-Cola. Therefore, there are persons who are of the opinion that those products contain high levels of sugar should be placed at a very high price in order to make people using less sugar. I strongly disagree from this perspective, and this essay will point out some key statements.
First of all, health problems caused from the use of sugary products are from the people’s behaviour, and set up these products to be expensive won’t make any difference. From the side of person who likes sugar and sweet taste, they will probably consider another replacement that still comfort their feeling, but at a cheaper price, and we couldn’t set all of those product at a very high price. For those who has a clear view of improving their health, they will work out later to reduce the negative impact from sugar. Either way, increasing the price of sugary products is infeasible.
Secondly, sugar is just one of the components that leads to unhealthy life. The excessive use of salty products such as fried potato (which contains high level of salt) and every other goods that has same characteristic would cause kidney diseases, which has the same threaten as diabetes. Moreover, the lack of excersises could also put a person’s health at risk. The limitation of sugar-consuming doesn’t ensure your health to be much better.
In conclusion, this essay is oppose to the idea of setting high price to sugary products to encourage people consume less sugar. The main reasons is due to the people’s behaviour won’t change, and there and many elements that also cause health problem aside from the sugar
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-05 | MEBC Class | view | |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
- The diagrams below show how floods happen in a village and give two solutions to deal with them Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparation where relevant 78
- Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The graph below shows the percentage of self employed workers of the total workforce in five countries in 1998 and 2008 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels ofsugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart shows the percentage of people who accessed news from 4 sources from 1995 and projection to 2025 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 362, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this product' or 'those products'?
Suggestion: this product; those products
...eaper price, and we couldn’t set all of those product at a very high price. For those who has...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9595959596 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52876971672 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56228956229 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2249345331 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.307692308 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361683709024 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127639718548 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832933663187 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240092621853 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575111224217 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.