Farmers within a country are often protected by tariffs that is special taxes on imported food Such policies are necessary and should be implemented wherever possible To what extent do you agree with this Give reasons for your answer and include any relev

Essay topics:

Farmers within a country are often protected by tariffs - that is, special taxes on imported food. Such policies are necessary, and should be implemented wherever possible.
To what extent do you agree with this?
Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Farmers within a country are often protected by tariffs - that is, special taxes on imported food. Such policies are necessary, and should be implemented wherever possible.
To what extent do you agree with this?
Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Nowadays, it is worth pointing out that tariffs or otherwise known as specific excises on food imported from foreign countries are being imposed by most nations in order to protect their domestic farmers. Then, a common belief about these policies is that tariffs are essential and should be put into effect as soon as achievable. From my point of view, the advantages of additional charges on foreign foodstuffs are irrefutable. However, these imposts should be implemented in a reasonable way so as not to cause maltreatment in international trade.

On the one hand, there is a variety of justification to advocate imposing tariffs. For a start, this type of tax is fundamental for every government to have a sustainable economy. It goes without saying that the income from imported foods will eventually return to pay taxes ịn the host country and the importing country benefits very little from these payments. Consequently, it would contribute to massive economic losses and to prevent this from happening, protective tariffs in an attempt to shieldguard the domestic sector against the massive inflow of international products is undoubtedly imperative. Moreover, without governmental patronage, domestic breeders and growers are no match for their international counterparts and will end up giving up on farming. This will be a true catastrophe due to the fact that the corresponding country will not be self-sufficient to produce its own food, especially during wartime.

Nevertheless, special taxes or other added expenses on imported foods should be carried out in a careful and equitable way. First and foremost, it is necessary for protective tariffs to be based on the interests of both exporting and importing countries. If the tax rate is excessively high, exporters will gradually withdraw, resulting in the aforementioned country losing a large amount of foreign currency supply from import and export transactions. In the second place, globalization is an incredible opportunity for the consumers and irrational taxation may interfere with the legitimate rights of the citizens. By the way of exemplifying, that each country has its own unique foods, creating diversity in the global cuisine. Therefore, extreme charges can keep these foods out of the hands of the most population, thereafter limiting their food choices.

In conclusion, the advantageous aspects of protective tariffs are irrefutable as they maintain an imperishable economy and ensure one nation can be self-supply with food. However, these additional taxes should be implemented in a careful and equitable way as excessively high charges may result in the withdrawal of food exporters and the importing country's residents will not benefit from globalization

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-20 hieu13092006 73 view
2022-05-16 longpham2k 73 view
2020-02-24 subesh 61 view
2019-01-30 harpar 60 view
Essays by user longpham2k :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 475, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a reasonable way" with adverb for "reasonable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...er, these imposts should be implemented in a reasonable way so as not to cause maltreatment in inte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, by the way, in the second place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2600.0 1615.20841683 161% => OK
No of words: 476.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46218487395 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11001608151 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546218487395 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 811.8 506.74238477 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1872474111 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.181818182 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437293183836 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125093359269 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101735714642 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255396036643 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112180056199 0.056905535591 197% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 78.4519038076 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.