Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Teachers play a crucial role in the academic prowess of students. They help to build not only the foundational knowledge of the students in academic concepts but also kindle their interest in a specific field of study. The prompt proposed that teachers should be paid salaries on the basis of the academic achievements of their students. In my opinion, I mostly agree with this suggestion and argue that teachers should be salaries commensurate to the performance of their students academically for two reasons.
The efficiency of humans in performing an assigned task is often times linked to a reward. Payment of teachers' salaries on the basis of the academic performances of their students will increase their enthusiasm to do their jobs sternly. Teaching as a day job can become banal to an individual, especially when the person is doing it to make ends meet and is not really passionate about it. For instance, most teachers are stereotypic in their teaching methods, and they often times do not make any efforts to improve their skills. This in turn affects students' learning, as the learning process becomes monotonous to them and this may be egregious to their performance academically. If teachers are paid on the basis of students' academic performance, they are most likely to become more creative in their teaching methods. They will develop more fun and engaging ways to impact knowledge in their students, so as to play their role in their students' learning efficiently.
Furthermore, payment of teachers' salaries on the grounds of the student's academic performance, will make teachers more attentive to the specific needs of their students in learning. This will propel them to develop a more personal bond with their "weak" students and try to carry them along with fast learners in the class. For instance, different students learn in different ways. Some are auditory learners, some visual learners, some verbal learners, and others are kinaesthetic learners (they learn by experimentation). Teachers will become meticulous with their teaching techniques, so as not to leave some students behind in the course of teaching. They will ensure to balance practical teaching methods with theoretical teaching ones, in other to accommodate all the different kinds of learners in the classroom. Teachers will also be more dynamic in testing students' knowledge of taught concepts.
However, this may not be fair in all cases of poor students' academic performance. This is because the academic performance of a student does not rest solely on the efforts or teaching methods of a teacher. Students also have a germane role to play in their academic success, as some students do not try to practice what they have been taught on their own for better understanding. And as such, it will be unfair to teachers that have put tremendous effort into teaching their students to get paid on the basis of the performance of apparently frivolous students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-24 | raghavchauhan619 | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | sunnyojh | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | sunnyojh | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | seoul_milk | 83 | view |
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 66
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens 66
- Skill alone no matter how great does not guarantee a masterpiece 66
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso 62
- Skill alone no matter how great does not guarantee a masterpiece 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 908, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... to impact knowledge in their students, so as to play their role in their students learn...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, thus, as to, for instance, in all cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2492.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17012448133 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89383614477 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427385892116 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.0 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9238174636 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.272727273 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251315588686 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983873563972 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665262541907 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194064242025 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521136504005 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.