Instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics, governments should spend the money on programmes encouraging the public to be active and stay healthy.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is some dispute whether the authorities should sponsor for athletes to compete at the Olympics or investment in raising public health. In my opinion, each approach has their own merits and combination of both would be more beneficial for nations.
Financing athletes joining Olympics would benefit a nation in many ways. First, when a professional sport player win a medal, their flag is raised along with other winning competitors. This gives their citizens a great sense of national pride. An addition point is that by investing in professional athletes, countries are able to increase their soft power in other worlds they can enhance their national image, which may hold the key to open various opportunities of cooperation in many fields with other countries. To illustrate, Son Heung Min, a famous Korean football player is the representative of Korean who endorse many products for Korean companies. Thus, successful Olympians play important role in developing many aspects of countries.
Having said that, spending on improvement of people's healh is also fundamental. Without the majority of population being healthy, nations would suffer from low national productivity which is one of the main culpirt of enconomies' slow growth. However, given adequate funding of sporty infrastructure and facilities, the political leaders would provide their citizens with places to do regular exercise. This motivates a more healthy lifestyle and ameliorates the impacts of common sedentary lifstyle these days. More importantly, development of recreational areas acts as a stimulus for social solidarity. This is because people will soon flock to where sport equipment installed and they are likely to get involved in meaningful conversation which in turn gives them a sense of communal living.
In the light of these facts, support for sport professionals is neccessary for raising reputation of nations but maintaining public health through social programmes is of equal importance. Therefore, it would be better for the society as a whole that the two strategies are made used together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-24 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2020-10-04 | Nimisha00 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | bob ngo | 56 | view |
| 2018-05-17 | Pemo Hoang | 61 | view |
- Many supermarkets are selling more and more products that are imported from other countries instead of selling food that is locally sourced What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The expansion of multinational companies and increase in globalization produce positive effects to everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What is the cause of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- It is thought by some that life is better in a city Others however prefer life in the countryside Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Employers should give their staff at least a 4 week holiday a year to make employees better at their jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44615384615 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94542710458 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655384615385 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.196532723 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124959462504 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402179141466 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373273069464 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754182687092 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232059570068 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.